```html

RPA Vendors: From RFSQ to Award—Winning Federal IT Services via TBIPS, SBIPS, ProServices on CanadaBuys

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors pursuing Government Contracts and professional services opportunities through the federal procurement landscape face a complex ecosystem of Government RFPs and specialized procurement vehicles. The path to winning Government Contracts in Canada requires navigating multiple mandatory procurement methods, understanding Government RFP Process Guides, and leveraging Government Procurement Best Practices across fragmented tender portals. For small-to-medium RPA integrators seeking to establish sustainable revenue streams through federal Government Procurement, success depends on mastering three primary procurement vehicles: Task-Based Informatics Professional Services (TBIPS), Solutions-Based Informatics Professional Services (SBIPS), and ProServices. These mechanisms, combined with the CanadaBuys platform—the unified portal for Government Contracts discovery—form the foundation of how Canadian federal departments source professional services. This comprehensive Canadian Government Contracting Guide examines how to Find Government Contracts Canada, Successfully Simplify Government Bidding Process, and develop repeatable strategies for navigating the journey from Request for Supply Arrangement qualification through final contract award. By understanding how to qualify for government contracts, what information is needed for government RFPs, and how to structure winning proposals using modern RFP Automation Canada and AI Government Procurement Software approaches, RPA vendors can transform their pursuit of federal opportunities into a strategic competitive advantage.

The Canadian Federal Procurement Landscape: Platform Architecture and Mandatory Methods of Supply

The Government of Canada's procurement modernization initiative represents one of the most significant transformations in how federal departments and agencies acquire professional services. Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC), which serves as the central purchasing authority for the federal government, manages this ecosystem through multiple interconnected systems and mandatory procurement methods designed to balance fairness, transparency, and value for Canadian taxpayers. The federal procurement system operates through principles of open competition, accessibility for qualified suppliers, and compliance with international trade agreements including the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement (CKFTA) and the World Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement.

At the center of this transformation stands CanadaBuys, the consolidated federal procurement platform that fundamentally changed how Canadian businesses identify and pursue Government Contracts. Launched to replace the legacy BuyandSell.gc.ca system, CanadaBuys integrates SAP Ariba as its underlying electronic procurement solution and now serves as the single authoritative source for federal tender opportunities valued at twenty-five thousand dollars and above. The platform currently hosts over one hundred eighty thousand registered suppliers and processes more than two hundred thousand daily interactions, making it simultaneously the most important access point for Government Procurement opportunities in Canada and one of the most technically complex systems to navigate effectively. The Government of Canada purchases approximately thirty-seven billion dollars annually in goods and services on behalf of federal departments and agencies, with Public Services and Procurement Canada and Shared Services Canada handling more than seventy-five percent of this procurement volume.

For RPA vendors and other professional services firms, understanding the architectural distinctions between various procurement methods becomes essential. The federal government has established mandatory methods of supply for different categories of professional services, each with distinct governance rules, valuation thresholds, evaluation criteria, and contract management procedures. These mandatory vehicles exist to streamline procurement processes while ensuring consistent application of fairness and transparency principles across all federal departments. Rather than allowing individual departments to create custom procurement processes for recurring categories of professional services, the government has pre-established these standardized procurement vehicles. This approach theoretically reduces administrative burden on both government contracting officers and suppliers while enabling economies of scale through consolidated procurement across multiple departments and agencies.

Task-Based Informatics Professional Services (TBIPS): Time and Resource-Based IT Procurement

The Task-Based Informatics Professional Services framework represents the federal government's mandatory procurement vehicle for time-based or task-based professional services within information technology and related technical domains. TBIPS supply arrangements allow federal departments to issue task authorizations against pre-qualified suppliers rather than conducting entirely new competitive procurements for each discrete requirement. Under TBIPS arrangements, suppliers compete to become pre-qualified providers on a government-wide supply arrangement that establishes pre-negotiated terms, conditions, and rate ceilings for future service delivery. This mechanism fundamentally differs from traditional procurement approaches where each requirement triggers a complete competitive bidding process; instead, TBIPS creates a pool of pre-vetted suppliers who have already demonstrated they meet mandatory qualification criteria and can be called upon as departmental needs arise.

TBIPS arrangements are organized into two primary tiers based on contract value thresholds. Tier 1 contracts cover requirements valued from the CKFTA threshold up to and including three point seven five million dollars, and can be managed by individual client departments or PSPC, depending on departmental contracting authority. Tier 2 contracts exceed the three point seven five million dollar threshold and must be managed by PSPC and other departments that have received specific delegation to manage contracts at this value level. The distinction between these tiers affects communication channels, approval processes, and the organizational entities responsible for contract award and administration. For RPA integrators offering smaller-scale automation consulting services, training delivery, feasibility assessment studies, or implementation support engagements valued below the Tier 2 threshold, TBIPS Tier 1 can provide reliable, repeatable contract opportunities with relatively shorter sales cycles compared to larger federal procurements that extend across multiple fiscal years.

The TBIPS supply arrangement covers seven core areas of informatics expertise that are commonly and nationally used by federal departments. When departments require IT-related professional services, they post task authorizations to the qualified supplier pool, inviting bids from pre-qualified providers. This approach theoretically accelerates the procurement process by allowing departments to skip the lengthy requirement definition and supplier qualification phases for recurring categories of work. However, the reality requires RPA vendors to first navigate the initial qualification process by responding to Request for Supply Arrangement solicitations, demonstrating they meet all mandatory criteria, and then maintaining their qualification through demonstrated performance on subsequent task authorization contracts. The federal government evaluates TBIPS bids across multiple evaluation factors including technical capability, past performance, compliance with mandatory requirements, and proposed pricing. Suppliers must maintain minimum two million dollar insurance coverage for the duration of any TBIPS supply arrangement and comply with any insurance requirements specified in individual task authorization bid solicitations.

Solutions-Based Informatics Professional Services (SBIPS): Outcome-Focused IT Solution Delivery

Solutions-Based Informatics Professional Services represents a fundamentally different procurement approach compared to TBIPS. Rather than organizing procurement around time-based resource deployment where suppliers provide personnel to perform defined work, SBIPS procurement emphasizes deliverables, performance expectations, and results measurement. Under SBIPS arrangements, the supplier bears responsibility for defining solutions, managing overall project delivery, and accepting accountability for specified outcomes. When federal departments require substantial IT professional services involving complex requirements, systems integration, architectural decisions, solution design responsibilities, or comprehensive automation initiatives, SBIPS supply arrangements typically apply. This outcome-focused orientation makes SBIPS particularly well-suited for RPA integrators seeking to deliver end-to-end automation solutions that genuinely address departmental business process challenges through integrated approaches combining process redesign, technology implementation, staff training, and ongoing optimization services.

SBIPS procurement also attracts significantly higher valuation capacity compared to TBIPS. Like TBIPS, SBIPS is organized into tiered structures, with Tier 1 covering requirements up to three point seven five million dollars and Tier 2 covering requirements exceeding this threshold. This higher valuation capacity makes SBIPS appropriate for substantial automation initiatives, multi-year implementation programs, and enterprise-wide RPA deployments that exceed what smaller TBIPS arrangements could accommodate. Mature RPA implementers with demonstrated delivery track records and successful case studies can unlock access to higher-value federal contracts through SBIPS qualification than TBIPS alternatives permit. However, SBIPS procurement also typically involves longer evaluation cycles and more rigorous technical assessment due to the complexity and financial magnitude of the proposed solutions. Government evaluation teams conduct more extensive due diligence on SBIPS proposals to ensure bidders have realistic understanding of requirements, feasible implementation approaches, and genuine capacity to deliver promised outcomes within proposed timelines and budgets.

The procurement process for SBIPS mirrors TBIPS in some respects but diverges significantly in evaluation criteria and technical requirements. Supply arrangements are issued following competitive bid processes where qualified suppliers submit detailed technical and pricing proposals. Evaluation focuses on the overall solution quality, implementation approach, team qualifications, relevant past performance on similar projects, and realistic cost estimation. Unlike TBIPS where time-and-materials pricing dominates, SBIPS typically involves fixed-price contracting or performance-based pricing models where the supplier accepts greater financial risk for delivery of specified outcomes. This distinction fundamentally changes the business model for RPA integrators; they must invest more heavily in pre-sales activities to thoroughly understand departmental requirements before submitting proposals, but the resulting contracts typically provide more predictable revenue streams compared to time-based TBIPS engagements.

ProServices: Simplified Professional Services Procurement Below Trade Agreement Thresholds

ProServices represents the federal government's mandatory procurement vehicle for professional services valued below the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement threshold. This method of supply encompasses both information technology and non-information technology professional services delivered by pre-qualified suppliers through a streamlined process designed to reduce administrative burden for smaller-value procurements. ProServices covers fifteen distinct streams including information technology professional services (streams one through seven), non-information technology services such as human resources consulting and business process improvement (streams eight through twelve), alternative dispute resolution services (stream thirteen), health services (stream fourteen), and learning services for government-owned training programs (stream fifteen). For RPA vendors offering smaller automation consulting engagements, specific technical implementation services, or feasibility studies valued below ProServices thresholds, this procurement vehicle can provide access to reliable opportunities with compressed sales cycles and simplified evaluation processes.

The ProServices framework operates through the Centralized Professional Services System (CPSS), an online portal where suppliers register to bid on opportunities and manage their pre-qualification status. Unlike TBIPS and SBIPS which involve periodic Request for Supply Arrangement solicitations, ProServices operates on an ongoing basis through the CPSS ePortal, allowing qualified suppliers to respond to task authorization opportunities as they are posted. Government departments search the CPSS database for pre-qualified suppliers matching their requirements and issue direct invitations to bid. The pre-qualification process for ProServices occurs on a continuous basis through quarterly refresh cycles, with suppliers receiving ongoing opportunities to submit bids to become or remain qualified. When government departments require competitive services, they must select a minimum of two pre-qualified suppliers, though best practices recommend inviting more suppliers to ensure robust competition. Suppliers typically receive five calendar days to respond to Request for Proposal solicitations under ProServices, requiring efficient proposal development capabilities and ready-to-deploy technical documentation.

CanadaBuys Platform: Unified Access to Federal Procurement Opportunities

The CanadaBuys platform fundamentally restructured how Canadian businesses access federal Government Contracts and professional services opportunities. As the official government-wide portal for tender opportunities, standing offers, supply arrangements, and procurement guidance, CanadaBuys serves as the single authoritative source for identifying federal procurement opportunities. The platform replaced the legacy BuyandSell system and consolidated multiple previously fragmented procurement sources into one unified digital ecosystem. This consolidation was intended to reduce complexity for suppliers seeking to identify relevant opportunities and to streamline government procurement operations by creating consistent digital submission standards across federal departments.

CanadaBuys operates on the SAP Ariba infrastructure, a cloud-based procurement platform widely adopted by governments and large enterprises globally. The migration to SAP Ariba enabled the Canadian government to implement sophisticated digital procurement workflows, electronic bid submission capabilities, and automated notification systems that dramatically improve transparency and accessibility compared to the paper-based procurement processes of previous decades. The platform supports full-lifecycle procurement operations from requirement publication through bid submission, evaluation, award notification, and contract amendment tracking. For RPA vendors and other suppliers, CanadaBuys serves as both the primary discovery mechanism for identifying relevant Government Contracts opportunities and the technical platform for submitting bid responses to federal procurement solicitations.

Accessing opportunities through CanadaBuys requires suppliers to register their businesses in SAP Ariba, establish secure credentials, and maintain active profiles with current business information. The platform allows suppliers to search opportunities using multiple filtering mechanisms including keywords, category codes, notice types, publication dates, and closing dates. Suppliers can also subscribe to email notifications for specific opportunity categories, enabling ongoing market surveillance without requiring manual portal monitoring. However, the fragmented nature of Canada's broader procurement ecosystem means that opportunities beyond federal procurement also exist through provincial tender portals, municipal procurement systems, and sector-specific marketplaces including MERX (which serves as Canada's primary national source of business opportunities for construction services, professional services, and other commodity categories). For RPA vendors pursuing comprehensive Government Contracts strategies, effective opportunity discovery requires monitoring multiple platforms simultaneously and leveraging technological capabilities to aggregate and qualify opportunities across these fragmented sources.

The Qualification Journey: Request for Supply Arrangement Processes and Mandatory Criteria

Before RPA vendors can pursue individual task authorizations or contract opportunities under TBIPS, SBIPS, or ProServices, they must first navigate the qualification process by responding to Request for Supply Arrangement (RFSA) solicitations. These solicitations define the mandatory criteria, evaluation factors, and submission requirements that bidders must satisfy to become pre-qualified suppliers eligible to bid on subsequent task authorizations. The RFSA process represents the critical gating function that determines which suppliers gain access to federal procurement opportunities and which remain excluded from this market segment. Understanding what information is needed for government RFPs begins with carefully analyzing RFSA documentation to identify all mandatory qualification requirements and ensuring proposed teams, credentials, certifications, and past experience directly align with stated criteria.

The RFSA documentation typically specifies mandatory criteria organized by education level, professional certifications, years of relevant experience, past project delivery experience, security clearance requirements, and other qualification factors. These mandatory criteria represent pass-fail evaluation gates; failure to meet any single mandatory requirement results in immediate disqualification from the pre-qualification process and exclusion from the supplier pool. This binary evaluation approach stands in contrast to rated evaluation factors that allow bidders to score varying points based on quality and extent of response. Common mandatory requirements for TBIPS supply arrangements include demonstrating financial stability through audited financial statements, holding specific security clearances such as Reliability Status through the Contract Security Program, compliance with Treasury Board policies including employment equity requirements for contractors with one hundred or more employees, and evidence of relevant professional experience in the specific informatics domain for which pre-qualification is sought.

TBIPS supply arrangements currently valid until July fourth, twenty twenty-eight operate on quarterly refresh cycles allowing new bidders to submit qualification bids at designated intervals throughout the year. Quarterly refreshes typically open for specific months (for example, Q1 opens in January through March with results announced by end of June), creating ongoing opportunities for new RPA vendors to pursue pre-qualification rather than waiting for the complete supply arrangement to be re-competed. This rolling qualification approach theoretically increases accessibility for newer market entrants and allows existing suppliers to expand their qualifications into additional categories without waiting for formal re-competition cycles. However, suppliers must understand that simply holding a pre-qualification does not guarantee any specific contract volumes; the supply arrangement merely establishes eligibility to bid on task authorizations when departments issue them. Pre-qualified suppliers face ongoing competitive pressure each time individual requirements are posted, as government contracting officers can select which qualified suppliers to invite for each task authorization opportunity.

Navigating the RFP Response Process: From Solicitation to Winning Proposals

Once RPA vendors achieve pre-qualification through successful RFSA responses, they enter the ongoing cycle of monitoring task authorization opportunities and responding to competitive bid solicitations issued by federal departments and agencies. The RFP response process begins with detailed understanding of specific solicitation requirements, evaluation criteria, and mandatory submission standards. Government procurement guidance emphasizes that every bid solicitation is unique and requires careful reading of all terms and conditions; treating solicitations as standardized templates subject to generic responses represents one of the most common mistakes that leads to proposal rejections or low evaluation scores. Successful RFP responses begin with meticulous analysis of stated requirements, identification of mandatory evaluation criteria, and verification that proposed solutions genuinely address departmental needs rather than representing generic capabilities descriptions.

Bid solicitation documents for TBIPS task authorizations typically contain minimum required elements including security requirements (if applicable), complete work descriptions in the form of Statements of Work, standard acquisition clauses and general conditions, bid preparation instructions, submission procedures specifying address and deadline information, evaluation procedures and basis for selection, financial capability requirements if applicable, applicable certifications, and conditions of resulting contracts. The Statement of Work deserves particular attention as it defines the specific deliverables, timelines, resource requirements, and acceptance criteria that successful bidders must fulfill. Responding bidders must address every section of the solicitation, provide all requested supporting information that demonstrates compliance with evaluation criteria, and clearly articulate how their proposed approach, team qualifications, past experience, and pricing represent optimal value compared to competing proposals.

The evaluation framework for TBIPS task authorizations typically involves both mandatory (pass-fail) and rated (point-based) evaluation factors. Mandatory factors must be addressed satisfactorily; any significant deficiency in mandatory criteria leads to elimination from further consideration. Rated factors allow evaluators to assign points or qualitative ratings based on proposal quality and extent of response. Common rated evaluation factors include technical approach and methodology, team qualifications and relevant experience, past performance on similar engagements, understanding of departmental requirements and constraints, proposed timeline feasibility, and cost reasonableness. RPA vendors must ensure their proposals demonstrate clear understanding of departmental automation challenges, proposed solution approaches grounded in industry best practices, team member qualifications explicitly tied to specific proposed roles, and compelling evidence of past successful delivery on comparable automation initiatives.

Compliance, Security Requirements, and Mandatory Certifications

Federal procurement processes involve substantial compliance requirements that extend far beyond technical proposal quality. Failure to satisfy compliance requirements—even when technical and pricing approaches are superior—results in proposal rejection and contract ineligibility. Understanding and addressing these requirements represents essential infrastructure for RPA vendors pursuing sustainable federal Government Contracts strategy. Common compliance requirements include signed certifications confirming supplier legal authority to enter into contracts, acceptance of all terms and conditions specified in solicitations, representations regarding corporate status and ownership, confirmation of employment equity compliance obligations for larger contractors, and detailed compliance with security requirements applicable to specific contracts.

Security requirements represent particularly critical compliance elements in federal IT procurement. Contracts that require personnel to access classified information, protected information, sensitive federal work sites, or systems containing restricted data necessitate security clearances for involved personnel. The Canadian Contract Security Program administers two primary personnel security clearance levels: Reliability Status (valid for ten years) and Secret Clearance (valid for five years), each requiring different levels of background investigation including residence history verification, electronic fingerprinting through RCMP-accredited providers, and CSIS-led loyalty assessments for Secret-level clearances. Organization-level security clearances involving Facility Security Clearance requirements demand additional compliance elements including biometric access controls, encrypted communication systems, and mandatory annual facility audits for Top Secret clearances.

For TBIPS supply arrangements specifically, suppliers must maintain valid Designated Organization Screening (DOS) with Reliability Status and register under specific supply arrangements through either the SAP Ariba system (now mandatory for all new registrations) or the Centralized Professional Services System portal for legacy systems transitioning to newer platforms. Many TBIPS task authorizations do not require security clearances, though individual requirements specify applicable security requirements in attached Security Requirement Checklists. RPA vendors pursuing federal opportunities must establish robust processes for tracking which personnel hold current security clearances, managing clearance renewal timelines, and ensuring compliance documentation remains accessible to support bid submissions requiring cleared personnel.

Opportunity Discovery and Qualification: The Role of Automated Intelligence

Traditional approaches to finding Government Contracts Canada require manual monitoring of multiple tender portals, assessment of eligibility against hundreds of criteria, and evaluation of relevance to organizational capabilities—a labor-intensive workflow where research indicates seventy-two percent of qualified opportunities are missed due to inefficient monitoring. The fragmented nature of Canadian procurement creates substantial opportunity cost when RPA vendors must individually track CanadaBuys, MERX, provincial tender portals, municipal procurement systems, and sector-specific marketplaces without technological support. Given the volume of procurement opportunities posted daily across these platforms, human capacity to monitor all relevant sources simultaneously becomes the limiting constraint.

Advanced technology platforms have begun addressing this discovery challenge through automated aggregation of tender opportunities from multiple sources including CanadaBuys API feeds, MERX data, and provincial portals. These platforms combine opportunity aggregation with natural language processing and machine learning algorithms trained on historical bid success patterns to identify opportunities with strongest alignment to specific organizational capabilities. Rather than relying on keyword matching alone, sophisticated platforms analyze actual requirements within one hundred-plus page RFP documents to extract critical qualifications, experience requirements, resource needs, and technical specifications. They then match these extracted requirements against organizational capabilities, past successful proposals, and relevant experience profiles maintained in organizational knowledge bases.

The efficiency gains from AI-driven opportunity discovery become significant at scale. Research indicates platforms leveraging machine learning achieve ninety-two percent accuracy in identifying winnable opportunities compared to traditional manual review approaches, while simultaneously reducing time investment required for opportunity qualification. For RPA vendors pursuing federal opportunities, the cost-benefit calculation for technology solutions depends on submission volume and deal size; organizations responding to five or more RFPs monthly across multiple procurement sources typically achieve positive return on investment within six months through reduced labor costs and improved win rates resulting from more strategic opportunity selection focused on highest-probability engagements.

Proposal Development and the Path to Contract Award

Once RPA vendors identify relevant opportunities and confirm their capability to address stated requirements, the proposal development process begins. Federal government RFPs in Canada typically provide bidders ten to fifteen business days to prepare and submit responses (TBIPS Tier 1 requirements specify minimum fifteen calendar days, which may be extended based on requirement complexity). This compressed timeframe requires RPA vendors to have robust infrastructure in place including readily available project descriptions, team member résumés with appropriate permissions for submission, past performance summaries highlighting relevant achievements, and pricing models aligned with basis of payment specifications outlined in solicitation annexes.

Winning proposals incorporate several critical elements. An executive summary communicating clear understanding of departmental requirements and proposed solution value must capture evaluator attention within initial reading minutes. A detailed statement of work explaining exactly what the vendor will accomplish, how the proposed approach addresses stated requirements, specific deliverables and acceptance criteria, timeline feasibility, and key personnel qualifications and relevant experience establishes technical credibility. Resource descriptions with résumés of proposed personnel explicitly connecting individual backgrounds to specific proposed roles demonstrate realistic team composition rather than generic descriptions. Pricing structures aligned with solicitation requirements—whether hourly rates for time-and-materials engagements, fixed-price deliverables, or performance-based models—must be clearly explained with sufficient detail to demonstrate reasonableness relative to proposed scope and complexity.

The proposal evaluation process typically occurs over four to eight weeks following the submission deadline, with government contracting officers potentially requesting clarifications that must be answered within specified response periods. These clarification requests do not delay evaluation timelines but rather allow contracting officers to better understand bidder proposals and make more informed evaluation decisions. Upon completion of evaluation, Award Notices are posted publicly and unsuccessful bidders are typically notified via telephone followed by formal letters. Government procurement practices allow unsuccessful bidders to request debriefings where contracting officers explain evaluation findings and areas where proposals could have been strengthened. These debriefings represent valuable learning opportunities for RPA vendors pursuing multiple federal opportunities; understanding specific evaluation perspectives and comparative performance against winning proposals informs strategy adjustments for future submissions.

Post-Award Contract Management and Ongoing Compliance

Successfully winning federal Government Contracts represents the beginning rather than the conclusion of vendor obligations. Once contracts are awarded, RPA vendors must ensure compliance with all contract terms, deliver specified work according to Statements of Work, maintain required insurance coverage and security clearances, and manage administrative requirements including invoice submission, progress reporting, and change order processes. Contract administration represents often-underestimated ongoing commitment requiring dedicated resources to track milestones, maintain documentation, and ensure timely communication with government contracting officers managing the engagement.

Performance on federal contracts becomes part of the vendor's permanent performance record, influencing future bid evaluation decisions. Government departments conducting proposal evaluations consider past performance information when comparing current bidders, and poor performance on previous contracts can substantially disadvantage future proposals. Conversely, demonstrating consistent delivery of quality work within budget and schedule on federal contracts creates substantial competitive advantage for subsequent opportunities. RPA vendors should treat federal contract performance as strategic marketing investment in future Government Contracts pipeline, recognizing that each successfully completed engagement strengthens competitive positioning for higher-value future opportunities.

Conclusion: Strategic Positioning for Federal IT Services Success

The path from initial Request for Supply Arrangement qualification through successful contract award and completion represents a complex journey requiring RPA vendors to master multiple interdependent processes, compliance requirements, and strategic considerations. Success depends on understanding how to Find Government Contracts Canada through systematic opportunity discovery, qualifying proposals through rigorous alignment with stated requirements, and developing winning approaches that deliver superior value compared to competing bidders. By establishing repeatable processes for opportunity identification, qualification assessment, proposal development, and post-award contract management, RPA vendors can transform federal Government Contracts from sporadic opportunities into sustainable revenue streams supporting organizational growth and market positioning. The federal procurement landscape, while complex, remains fundamentally accessible to professional services firms that invest time in understanding mandatory procurement methods, compliance requirements, and evaluation criteria governing TBIPS, SBIPS, and ProServices procurement vehicles operating through CanadaBuys and related platforms.

Sources

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html

• https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracting-canada-ai-rfp-solutions

• https://publicus.ai/newsletter/rpa-implementers-in-canada-navigating-canadabuys-to-turn-tbips-sbips-and-proservices-access-into-repeatable-federal-wins

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/spics-sbips-eng.html

• https://www.ccc.ca/en/insights-for-exporters/get-to-know-the-government-of-canada-procurement-process/

• https://publicus.ai/newsletter/rpa-integrators-winning-federal-work-via-sbips-tbips-proservices-and-acan-on-canadabuys

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sp-ps/index-eng.html

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/sspc-cpss-doe-agd-p3-eng.html

• https://loopio.com/blog/rfp-statistics-win-rates/

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/professional.html

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/support-for-businesses/bid-on-opportunities/prepare.html

• https://narwin.ai/rfp-automation-vs-manual-process-time-cost-and-win-rate-breakdown/

• https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracting-sap-ariba-ontario-tenders-guide

• https://publicus.ai/newsletter/cybersecurity-procurement-guide-canadian-gov-contracts

• https://camsc.ca/event/mastering-rfp-responses-best-practices-for-winning-proposals/

• https://publicus.ai/newsletter/rpa-implementers-in-canada-navigating-canadabuys-to-turn-tbips-sbips-and-proservices-access-into-repeatable-federal-wins

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html

• https://opo-boa.gc.ca/cinqprincipaux-topfive-eng.html

• https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/laws-regulations/labour/interpretations-policies/standing-offers.html

• https://hinzconsulting.com/proposal-evaluation-understanding-the-process/

• https://www.merx.com

• https://opo-boa.gc.ca/praapp-prorev/2009-2010/chptr-5-eng.html

• https://www.acquisition.gov/far/15.305

• https://www.merx.com/public/solicitations/open

• https://publicus.ai/newsletter/rpa-implementers-in-canada-navigating-canadabuys-to-turn-tbips-sbips-and-proservices-access-into-repeatable-federal-wins

• https://www.tbs-sct.canada.ca/pubs_pol/dcgpubs/contracting/acan_guide01-txt-eng.htm

• https://www.accenture.com/us-en/industries/public-service

• https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/

• https://wiki.gccollab.ca/images/c/c7/Non-Competitive_Contracting.docx

• https://sam.gov/opportunities

• https://businesslink.ca/how-to-write-a-winning-proposal-for-an-rfp-in-canada/

• https://procurementsciences.com/leverage-ai-for-strategic-opportunity-discovery-in-government-contracting/

• https://www.ipss.ca/procurement/sbips/

• https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/bc-procurement-resources/ministry_guide_to_the_request_for_proposals_2025-04-23.pdf

• https://govspend.com/ai/

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html

• https://opo-boa.gc.ca/rapports-reports/2024-2025/index-eng.html

• https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/bc-procurement-resources/ministry_guide_to_the_request_for_proposals_2025-04-23.pdf

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/aaspsv-passsa-eng.html?wbdisable=true

• https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/support-for-businesses/bid-on-opportunities/prepare.html

• https://www.tricitieschamber.com/assets/pdf/Introduction+to+federal+procurement+-+Notes

• https://www.fns.usda.gov/research/snap/analysis-robotic-process-automation

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/news/2018/07/government-of-canada-awards-contract-for-electronic-procurement-solution.html

• https://www.deltek.com/en/government-contracting/guide/win-government-contracts

• https://www.dol.gov/agencies/eta/ui-modernization/promising-practices/rpa-use-cases

• https://procurementsciences.com

• https://iquasar.com/blog/the-best-way-to-secure-a-government-contract-bid-in-2025/

• https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/cr/2025/english/1canea2025003-source-pdf.pdf

• https://about.bgov.com/insights/government-contracting/trends-in-federal-contract-spending/

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html

• https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/guideline-service-digital.html

• https://www.gsa.gov/about-us/newsroom/news-releases/gsa-adobe-reach-agreement-to-cut-costs-for-government-05082025

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/software/qualifying-supply-arrangment.html

• https://www.acquisition.gov/afars/chapter-3-evaluation-and-decision-process

• https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/canada-digital-ambition/canada-digital-ambition-2024-25.html

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html

• https://www.acquisition.gov/far/15.305

• https://ictc-ctic.ca/news-and-events/news-articles/unlocking-canadas-250-billion-digital-opportunity

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/support-for-businesses/bid-on-opportunities/prepare.html

```