OT Security Integrators: Winning Federal Contracts via TBIPS, RFSO, and ACAN on CanadaBuys

The operational technology security landscape in Canada presents substantial opportunities for specialized integrators seeking to serve the federal government. As cyber threats targeting critical infrastructure intensify, government contracts for OT security services have become increasingly valuable and competitive. Understanding the intricacies of government procurement, particularly through specialized vehicles such as Task-Based Informatics Professional Services (TBIPS), Request for Standing Offer (RFSO), and Advance Contract Award Notice (ACAN), is essential for OT security integrators aiming to capture federal government contracts. The Canadian government procurement process, facilitated through CanadaBuys and managed primarily by Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC), offers multiple pathways for qualified firms to provide government RFPs responses and secure long-term government procurement relationships. This comprehensive guide explores how to win government contracts Canada through these specialized procurement mechanisms, while addressing the unique challenges and best practices for professional services government contracts in the OT security sector.

Understanding Operational Technology Security in the Canadian Government Context

Operational technology security has emerged as a critical priority for the Government of Canada, particularly as critical infrastructure faces increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. According to the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, operational technology refers to computing systems used to automate industrial processes and operations across various sectors, with industrial control systems representing a major subset that allows critical infrastructure providers to remotely monitor processes and control physical devices. These systems span Canada's ten critical infrastructure sectors identified in the National Strategy for Critical Infrastructure: energy and utilities, finance, food, government, health, information and communication technology, manufacturing, safety, transportation, and water.

The distinction between information technology and operational technology is fundamental for security integrators to understand when pursuing government contracts. While IT security focuses on the CIA triad of confidentiality, integrity, and availability with an emphasis on protecting data and intellectual property, OT security must prioritize safety and availability first. As noted in guidance from the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, disruptions to OT systems can lead to immediate physical consequences, potentially affecting human safety and the continuous operation of critical infrastructure. This fundamental difference shapes how government procurement evaluates OT security solutions and the qualifications required from service providers.

Government entities managing operational technology face unique challenges that create opportunities for specialized integrators. Legacy equipment remains prevalent in many OT environments due to high replacement costs and slow-changing system requirements, meaning industrial control systems often contain known vulnerabilities. The value of operational technology is directly related to continual and consistent operation, which creates fewer opportunities for system downtime, updates, and equipment replacement. Consequently, OT cybersecurity's primary responsibility becomes ensuring the availability of industrial control systems while implementing security measures that do not disrupt critical operations.

The Task-Based Informatics Professional Services Supply Arrangement

The Task-Based Informatics Professional Services supply arrangement represents the mandatory method of supply for provision of task-based informatics professional services at or above the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement threshold. According to Public Services and Procurement Canada documentation, TBIPS covers seven core areas of expertise: application services, geomatics services, information management and information technology services, business services, project management services, cyber protection services, and telecommunications services. For OT security integrators, the cyber protection services stream presents the most directly relevant pathway to federal government contracts.

Task-based services are defined as finite work assignments related to a particular activity or initiative required to address a specific information technology need. These services involve a specific start date, specific end date, and set of deliverables. Tasks are usually not large projects, although they may be subsets of larger projects. This structure is particularly well-suited to many OT security implementations, which often require highly specialized work performed by personnel with rare or unique skills for relatively short periods. Under TBIPS arrangements, the supplier is responsible for the resource they put forward to complete the work, must ensure that the resource performs the work in line with the statement of work, and must provide supervision to ensure quality meets contract requirements.

The cyber protection services stream within TBIPS encompasses multiple categories directly relevant to OT security integrators. Stream 6 includes roles such as Strategic IT Security Planning and Protection Consultant, IT Security Methodology Policy and Procedures Analyst, IT Security Threat and Risk Assessment and Certification and Accreditation Analyst, Public Key Infrastructure Specialist, IT Security Engineer, IT Security Design Specialist, Network Security Analyst, IT Security Systems Operator, IT Security Installation Specialist, IT Security Vulnerability Analysis Specialist, Incident Management Specialist, Physical IT Security Specialist, Computer Forensics Specialist, and Privacy Impact Assessment Specialist. Each category includes three experience levels: Level 1 with less than five years of experience, Level 2 with five to less than ten years of experience, and Level 3 with ten or more years of experience.

For OT security integrators, the IT Security Engineer category is particularly relevant. Responsibilities in this category include reviewing and applying secure IT architecture fundamentals, IT security protocols at all layers of OSI and TCP/IP stacks, network routers and switches, application and host hardening, intrusion detection and prevention systems, wireless technology, and cryptographic algorithms. These professionals must identify technical threats to and vulnerabilities of networks, manage IT security configuration, analyze IT security tools and techniques, prepare technical reports including IT security solution option analyses and implementation plans, and provide independent verification and validation support to IT security-related projects. Specialties within this category include expertise in SSL, HTTP, FTP, Telnet, S-MIME, IPSec, SSH, X.400/X.500 Directory Standards, TCP/IP, OSI, DNS, SMTP, and various other protocols critical to OT security implementations.

Qualifying for TBIPS and Navigating the Quarterly Refresh Process

Becoming a qualified supplier under TBIPS requires navigating both the initial qualification process and understanding the ongoing opportunity to qualify through quarterly refreshes. The TBIPS supply arrangement provides ongoing opportunities for suppliers to qualify for additional categories to be added to their supply arrangement. According to PSPC documentation, participation in refresh solicitations is entirely optional and not required to maintain any existing TBIPS supply arrangement. However, for firms seeking to expand their qualified categories or for new suppliers entering the federal marketplace, these quarterly refreshes represent critical opportunities.

The quarterly refresh schedule operates on a predictable timeline that OT security integrators should incorporate into their business development planning. The schedule includes four fiscal year quarters: Q1 running from April opening to June closing with estimated awards by end of September; Q2 from July to September with awards by end of December; Q3 from October to December with awards by end of March; and Q4 from January to March with awards by end of June. It is important to note that the Centralized Professional Services System will not allow a bidder to submit another bid to a subsequent period until results of their previously submitted bid are published, requiring strategic planning about when to submit qualification applications.

New suppliers entering the TBIPS system must demonstrate they meet specific mandatory professional criteria for each category they wish to qualify under. For cyber protection services categories, this typically involves demonstrating relevant certifications, years of experience, and past performance on comparable projects. Suppliers must register through the Centralized Professional Services ePortal and complete their qualification submission during the open period for a given quarter. The evaluation process assesses both the organizational capabilities of the firm and the qualifications of proposed resources across the experience levels the firm seeks to qualify for.

Existing pre-qualified suppliers who have been issued a supply arrangement are not required to submit new bids under quarterly refreshes unless they wish to modify their supply arrangement by adding additional categories. This structure creates a competitive advantage for established suppliers who have already invested in the qualification process, while providing clear entry points for new suppliers four times per year. Canada evaluates submissions received during each quarter according to the schedule, and participation in a refresh evaluation is entirely optional and not required to maintain any supply arrangement.

Request for Standing Offer: Creating Ongoing Procurement Relationships

The Request for Standing Offer represents another critical procurement vehicle for OT security integrators seeking sustained relationships with federal government clients. As defined in the Standard Acquisition Clauses and Conditions Manual, a standing offer is an offer from a potential supplier to provide goods or services at pre-arranged prices, under set terms and conditions, when and if required. It is crucially important to understand that a standing offer is not a contract until the government issues a call-up against the standing offer. This structure provides flexibility for both the government buyer and the supplier while establishing pre-negotiated terms that expedite individual procurement actions.

Standing offers are typically established through a competitive Request for Standing Offer process. According to Treasury Board contracting policy guidance, an RFSO is used to solicit standing offers from multiple suppliers, allowing the government to compare pricing, capabilities, and terms before establishing the standing offer arrangement. Once established, authorized government buyers can issue call-ups against the standing offer without conducting a new competitive process for each individual requirement, provided the requirement falls within the scope and limits of the standing offer.

For OT security integrators, standing offers provide several strategic advantages in the federal government marketplace. First, they reduce the administrative burden and cost associated with responding to individual competitive solicitations for similar or recurring services. Once a standing offer is established, the supplier can receive call-ups relatively quickly as needs arise across government departments. Second, standing offers create predictability in pricing and terms, allowing both the supplier and government clients to plan resources and budgets more effectively. Third, they establish a preferred supplier relationship that, while not exclusive, positions the standing offer holder advantageously when requirements arise within the defined scope.

The RFSO template and process, as documented in PSPC's standard templates, includes several critical sections that OT security integrators must address comprehensively. Part 1 covers general information about the requirement and the solicitation process. Part 2 provides offeror instructions, including how to structure the response and what certifications are required. Part 3 details offer preparation instructions, specifying the format and content requirements for proposals. Part 4 outlines evaluation procedures and criteria, which typically include both technical merit and financial considerations. Part 5 establishes the terms and conditions that will apply to the standing offer and any resulting call-ups. Annexes include the statement of work or requirement, basis of payment, and any security requirements that apply.

Certifications precedent to issuance of a standing offer represent a critical compliance element. Offerors whose offers are technically and financially responsive must meet specific conditions before a standing offer can be issued. These may include Federal Contractors Program for Employment Equity certifications for offers above certain thresholds, declarations regarding work force reduction programs, and for non-NAFTA and non-WTO-AGP requirements subject to Canadian Content Policy, specific Canadian content certifications. OT security integrators must ensure they maintain current certifications and can provide required documentation promptly when their offer is selected.

Advance Contract Award Notices: Navigating Sole Source Justifications

The Advance Contract Award Notice represents a specialized procurement mechanism that allows government departments to signal their intention to award a contract to a pre-identified supplier while providing other suppliers an opportunity to demonstrate they can meet the requirement. According to Treasury Board guidance, an ACAN must provide sufficient information to allow suppliers to determine if they possess the capabilities required to satisfy the government's requirements and to permit the contracting authority to have an adequate basis for reviewing potential suppliers' statements of capabilities. For OT security integrators, understanding when and how ACANs are used can reveal opportunities to either challenge planned sole-source awards or to structure their offerings to justify sole-source procurement when appropriate.

The ACAN process operates on a specific timeline with important implications for potential suppliers. When a federal department issues an ACAN, it must be published for a minimum of fifteen calendar days. During this posting period, other suppliers may submit a statement of capabilities demonstrating they can satisfy the requirements set out in the notice. If other potential suppliers submit statements of capabilities during the fifteen calendar day posting period that meet the requirements set out in the ACAN, the government must proceed to a full tendering process through either the government's electronic tendering service or traditional means. However, if no other supplier submits a statement of capabilities meeting the requirements by the closing date, a contract may be awarded to the pre-selected supplier without further competition.

Understanding what justifies an ACAN is critical for OT security integrators on both sides of the equation. According to Treasury Board policy, ACANs may be used when only one supplier can reasonably perform the work due to factors such as unique expertise, proprietary technology, compatibility requirements with existing systems, or exigent operational requirements. For OT security integrators who have developed specialized capabilities in particular OT environments, industrial control systems, or critical infrastructure sectors, these factors may justify sole-source procurement through an ACAN. Conversely, integrators monitoring ACAN postings may identify opportunities where their capabilities meet or exceed the stated requirements, allowing them to submit a statement of capabilities that triggers full competition.

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal has provided important guidance on ACAN requirements and supplier rights through various procurement inquiry decisions. The CITT noted that an ACAN often provides only a short description of the specific requirement for which a solution is being sought. Therefore, a statement of capabilities from a potential supplier who views its alternative solution as viable cannot be expected to contain the same level of detail as would its response to a competitive bid solicitation. The CITT determined that if another potential supplier believes itself capable of responding to the government's operational needs, it should be given the opportunity to respond in a competitive environment to a fully detailed statement of requirements. This interpretation protects the competitive process while recognizing the limited information available during the ACAN posting period.

For OT security integrators, effectively responding to an ACAN requires a strategic approach. The statement of capabilities must clearly demonstrate that the firm possesses the technical capabilities, relevant experience, and resources necessary to satisfy the requirement as described in the ACAN. This typically involves referencing comparable past performance, highlighting relevant certifications and qualifications of key personnel, and explaining the firm's understanding of the requirement and approach to satisfying it. The statement should be concise yet comprehensive enough to convince the contracting authority that full competition is warranted. Importantly, suppliers should maintain awareness that submitting a statement of capabilities may trigger a competitive process in which they must then participate and compete effectively against the originally identified supplier.

Security Clearances and Compliance Requirements for OT Security Contracts

Security clearance requirements represent a significant consideration for OT security integrators pursuing federal government contracts in Canada. According to the Contract Security Program administered by Public Services and Procurement Canada, security screening is necessary when a Government of Canada contract requires personnel to access classified or protected information, assets, or sensitive sites. For OT security work involving critical infrastructure, industrial control systems, or classified networks, such requirements are common and must be addressed proactively by firms seeking to compete in this market.

The Contract Security Program provides security screening of organizations and their personnel for solicitations and contracts with security requirements. Two types of screenings are relevant: organization security screening, which determines if the organization participating in government solicitations and contracts meets the security requirements of the solicitation or contract; and personnel security screening, which determines if an employee can be trusted with protected or classified information, assets, or work sites. Security requirements are typically identified in bid solicitation documents and in the Security Requirements Check List form (TBS/SCT 350-103) completed by the contracting department.

For OT security integrators, obtaining organization security screening should be pursued well in advance of bidding on specific opportunities. The screening process involves demonstrating that the organization has appropriate security policies, procedures, and physical security measures in place to protect government information and assets. Once organizational screening is achieved, personnel security screening can be requested for specific employees who will work on contracts with security requirements. The level of security clearance required varies depending on the nature of the work and the classification level of information and systems involved.

The Contract Security Manual provides detailed requirements that private sector organizations must follow for safeguarding government information and assets provided to or produced by organizations awarded government contracts with security requirements. For OT security integrators, these requirements extend beyond traditional IT security practices to encompass physical security of facilities where government work is performed, personnel screening and reliability standards, information handling and storage procedures, and incident reporting obligations. Maintaining compliance with these requirements represents an ongoing operational commitment that must be factored into business planning and cost structures.

Leveraging CanadaBuys and Electronic Procurement Systems

CanadaBuys serves as the Government of Canada's official procurement site and represents the primary platform through which OT security integrators discover and respond to federal opportunities. Launched by Public Services and Procurement Canada to replace the legacy Buyandsell.gc.ca site, CanadaBuys integrates electronic procurement capabilities designed to make the process more efficient and accessible for businesses of all sizes. Understanding how to effectively use CanadaBuys and associated electronic procurement systems is essential for successful business development in the federal government market.

Key features of CanadaBuys include tender and award notices serving as the primary source for opportunities and awarded contracts across federal departments, supplier registration enabling businesses to access procurement opportunities and bid on tenders, user-friendly search tools allowing suppliers to search contract opportunities using keywords, Goods and Services Identification Numbers, and filters by region, department, or commodity, and digital procurement tools to simplify the bidding process. For OT security integrators, configuring search parameters to capture relevant opportunities across cyber protection services, critical infrastructure security, industrial control system security, and related categories ensures comprehensive opportunity awareness.

Public Services and Procurement Canada has transitioned federal procurement to SAP Ariba as its electronic procurement solution. Suppliers must register through SAP Ariba to participate in many federal procurement opportunities. The CanadaBuys Service Desk provides support for suppliers experiencing difficulties with SAP Ariba registration or use. For TBIPS and other professional services supply arrangements, the Centralized Professional Services System ePortal serves as the specific platform for qualification submissions and contract management. Understanding the distinct roles of these various systems and ensuring proper registration across all relevant platforms is a foundational requirement for federal government contracting.

Electronic bid submission through these platforms offers several advantages over traditional paper-based submission. Suppliers receive automatic confirmation of submission, can track the status of their submissions, receive notifications of amendments or questions and answers during the solicitation period, and benefit from reduced courier costs and timing risks associated with physical delivery. However, electronic submission also requires attention to technical requirements, file size limitations, format specifications, and submission deadlines, which are typically strictly enforced with no allowance for technical difficulties. OT security integrators should conduct test submissions and ensure their teams are thoroughly familiar with the electronic submission process well before critical proposal deadlines.

Strategic Positioning and Capability Development for OT Security Integrators

Successfully winning federal contracts for OT security services requires strategic positioning beyond simply responding to individual opportunities as they arise. OT security integrators must develop and maintain capabilities aligned with government priorities, build a track record of past performance that demonstrates competence and reliability, and establish relationships within the federal procurement community while adhering to appropriate ethical boundaries. The intersection of cyber security priorities and critical infrastructure protection creates a dynamic market where positioning must evolve with emerging threats and government responses.

Canada's National Cyber Security Strategy articulates the government's long-term plan to tackle cyber security challenges in partnership with provinces, territories, Indigenous communities, industry, and academia. For OT security integrators, understanding the strategic priorities outlined in this strategy provides insight into where procurement emphasis is likely to focus. The strategy emphasizes working with partners to protect Canadians and Canadian businesses from cyber threats, making Canada a global cyber security industry leader, and detecting and disrupting cyber threat actors. Each pillar creates distinct opportunities for specialized service providers who can demonstrate alignment with these strategic objectives.

The Canadian Centre for Cyber Security's National Cyber Threat Assessment provides detailed analysis of the threat landscape facing Canada's critical infrastructure and industrial control systems. According to the most recent assessment, Canada confronts an expanding and complex cyber threat landscape with state and non-state cyber threat actors targeting critical infrastructure and endangering national security. State-sponsored cyber operations against Canada almost certainly extend beyond espionage to include attempts to cause disruptive effects such as denying service, deleting or leaking data, and manipulating industrial control systems. The assessment specifically notes that adversaries very likely consider civilian critical infrastructure to be a legitimate target for cyber sabotage in the event of military conflict, creating urgent requirements for enhanced OT security across all critical infrastructure sectors.

Capability development should align with specific guidance documents published by the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security. Resources such as Security Considerations for Critical Infrastructure, Developing an Operational Technology and Information Technology Incident Response Plan, and Cyber Supply Chain Security for Small and Medium-Sized Organizations provide frameworks that government procurement will increasingly reference in requirements. OT security integrators who demonstrate familiarity with these frameworks, incorporate their recommendations into service offerings, and can articulate how their approaches align with government security guidance position themselves advantageously in competitive evaluations.

Past performance remains the single most important factor in many government procurement evaluations, particularly for complex technical services such as OT security integration. Building a portfolio of successfully completed federal, provincial, or municipal government contracts creates a foundation for pursuing larger and more sophisticated opportunities. For firms without existing government past performance, several strategies can help establish credibility: partnering with established government contractors who possess past performance records, pursuing smaller threshold contracts that have lower barriers to entry, seeking opportunities specifically set aside for small businesses or Indigenous businesses where applicable, and leveraging relevant private sector experience with analogous systems and requirements when government past performance is limited. Each successfully completed contract creates a reference that strengthens future proposals, making persistence in the government market essential even when early attempts are unsuccessful.

Proposal Development Best Practices for Technical Services Procurement

Developing winning proposals for federal OT security contracts requires a disciplined approach that addresses both technical merit and compliance with procurement requirements. Government evaluators assess proposals against explicitly stated criteria using structured evaluation methodologies, making it essential that proposals directly and demonstrably address each evaluation criterion. Unlike private sector business development where relationship and reputation may carry significant weight, government procurement evaluation must follow documented processes that ensure fairness and transparency, requiring proposals to stand on their written merits.

Understanding the evaluation methodology specified in each solicitation is foundational to proposal development. Federal procurements typically employ one of several evaluation approaches: highest combined rating of technical merit and price, where technical and financial components are evaluated separately and combined according to a specified weighting; lowest price among technically acceptable proposals, where proposals must achieve a minimum technical score to be considered but award is then based solely on price; or rated requirements with financial assessment, where technical requirements are rated and scored with financial proposals evaluated only for those achieving minimum technical thresholds. The specified methodology dictates proposal strategy, particularly regarding the balance between technical elaboration and competitive pricing.

Technical proposals for OT security services must address several key dimensions that evaluators consistently assess. First, understanding of the requirement demonstrates that the proponent comprehends the government's needs, the environment in which services will be delivered, and the outcomes the government seeks to achieve. Second, proposed approach articulates the methodology, processes, and techniques the firm will employ to satisfy the requirement, including how potential challenges will be addressed and risks mitigated. Third, resource qualifications establish that proposed personnel possess the necessary education, certifications, experience, and expertise to perform the work successfully. Fourth, organizational capacity demonstrates that the firm has appropriate infrastructure, security clearances, quality assurance processes, and management systems to support contract performance.

Financial proposals require careful development to balance competitiveness with realism. Federal procurement increasingly scrutinizes pricing to ensure it reflects realistic costs and does not represent unsustainably low bids that create performance risk. Basis of payment varies across procurements and may include firm fixed price, cost reimbursable, time and materials, or other arrangements. Understanding the specified basis of payment and structuring financial proposals accordingly is critical. For TBIPS contracts, pricing is typically structured around daily or hourly rates for different resource categories and experience levels, with justification required for any premium pricing relative to market norms. OT security integrators should maintain current market intelligence regarding prevailing rates for various security roles to ensure pricing is competitive yet sustainable.

Compliance checking before submission represents a final critical step that many firms inadequately address. Proposals must include all mandatory forms, certifications, and attachments specified in the solicitation. Even strong technical and financial proposals will be disqualified if they omit mandatory elements. Developing a compliance matrix that lists each mandatory requirement and identifies where in the proposal it is addressed provides a systematic approach to ensuring completeness. Independent review by personnel not involved in proposal development can identify gaps or areas of confusion that authors may overlook due to their familiarity with the content.

Conclusion: Building a Sustainable Federal OT Security Practice

For OT security integrators, the federal government market represents a substantial and growing opportunity driven by intensifying cyber threats to critical infrastructure and expanding government investment in operational technology security. Successfully capturing these opportunities requires understanding the specialized procurement vehicles through which the majority of relevant work flows, including Task-Based Informatics Professional Services for recurring needs, Request for Standing Offer for establishing pre-negotiated supply relationships, and Advance Contract Award Notice for appropriate sole-source circumstances. Each procurement vehicle serves distinct purposes within the overall government contracting framework and requires tailored approaches to qualification, positioning, and proposal development.

The path to success in this market extends beyond tactical proposal development to encompass strategic capability development, proactive security clearance acquisition, systematic opportunity monitoring, and continuous learning about evolving government priorities and threat landscapes. OT security integrators who invest in understanding these dimensions, align their technical capabilities with government security frameworks and guidance, and develop robust processes for discovering and responding to opportunities position themselves to build sustainable government practices that contribute to Canada's critical infrastructure resilience while creating long-term business value.

Tools that help find, qualify, and draft proposals can save significant time in the government contracting process, particularly as firms scale their business development activities across multiple simultaneous opportunities. However, technology must complement rather than replace the deep technical expertise, security knowledge, and government contracting acumen that ultimately determine success in this specialized market. By combining strategic positioning, technical excellence, procurement process mastery, and efficient business development practices, OT security integrators can effectively compete for and win the federal contracts that drive growth and impact in Canada's critical infrastructure protection mission.

Sources

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/index-eng.html

• https://publicus.ai/glossary/request-for-standing-offer

• https://www.bidsandtenders.com/suppliers-resources/selling-to-the-canadian-government-a-supplier-s-guide/

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/spics-sbips-eng.html

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/documents/2t-rfso1-eng.pdf

• https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/canada-selling-government

• https://opo-boa.gc.ca/praapp-prorev/2008-2009/chptr-3-eng.html

• https://www.industrialdefender.com/blog/ot-cybersecurity-the-ultimate-guide

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/industrial-security/security-requirements-contracting.html

• https://www.tbs-sct.canada.ca/pubs_pol/dcgpubs/contracting/acan_guide-eng.rtf

• https://www.cisco.com/site/us/en/learn/topics/security/what-is-ot-security.html

• https://www.optiv.com/solutions/canada-operations

• https://vipondcontrols.ca/ot-system-integration/

• https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/security-considerations-critical-infrastructure-itsap10100

• https://ca.indeed.com/q-ics-scada-security-jobs.html

• https://www.pwc.com/ca/en/services/consulting/cybersecurity-privacy/industrial-and-internet-of-things.html

• https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/crtcl-nfrstrctr/cci-iec-en.aspx

• https://ca.indeed.com/q-ics-scada-jobs.html

• https://www.ccc.ca/en/insights-for-exporters/get-to-know-the-government-of-canada-procurement-process/

• https://cassels.com/insights/primer-on-federal-government-contracting/

• https://www.biddetail.com/blogdetail/request-for-proposal-government-of-canada-a-complete-guide/1037

• https://www.bidsandtenders.com/suppliers-resources/selling-to-the-canadian-government-a-supplier-s-guide/

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/support-for-businesses/understand-procurement-process/how-government-buys.html

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/support-for-businesses/bid-on-opportunities/prepare.html

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/cyberprotect-eng.html

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/professional.html

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sp-ps/vltcat-strmcat-eng.html

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/categories-eng.html

• https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/

• https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/

• https://www.carahsoft.com/buy/canada-contracts/provincial

• https://www.bidsandtenders.com/suppliers-resources/10-ways-to-get-noticed-by-government-buyers/

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/support-for-businesses.html

• https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/cyber-supply-chain-security-small-medium-sized-organizations-itsap00070

• https://iq.govwin.com/neo/marketAnalysis/view/10-Hotspots-in-Canadian-Government-Contracting-for-2025/66905?researchTypeId=2&researchMarket=PCMAP

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/spics-sbips-eng.html

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/industrial-security/security-requirements-contracting/security-screening-government-contracts.html

• https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/recommended-cyber-security-contract-clauses-cloud-services-itsm50104

• https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/spicsaa-sbipssa-eng.html

• https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/industrial-security/security-requirements-contracting.html

• https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ntnl-cbr-scrt-strtg-2025/index-en.aspx

• https://www.g2.com/products/merx/competitors/alternatives

• https://www.merx.com/resources/articles/how-to-improve-your-rfp-responses

• https://therfpfirm.com/proposal-writing/

• https://www.merx.com

• https://www.cmc-canada.ca/consult/responding-to-rfps-vendor-beware

• https://outsourcemarketing.ca/marketing-services/proposal-writing-service/

• https://search.open.canada.ca/contracts/

• https://www.merx.com

• https://opo-boa.gc.ca/pmr-psp-eng.html

• https://ontariotenders.app.jaggaer.com/esop/nac-host/public/web/login.html

• http://www.bidscanada.com/default.cfm?page=420

• https://www.sac-isc.gc.ca/eng/1696513417823/1696513480139

• https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/operational-technology-ot-security-market-18524133.html

• https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/crtcl-nfrstrctr/cci-iec-en.aspx

• https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/guidance/national-cyber-threat-assessment-2025-2026

• https://www.grandviewresearch.com/horizon/outlook/security-market/canada

• https://tc.canada.ca/en/programs/airport-critical-infrastructure-program

• https://budget.canada.ca/home-accueil-en.html