Tired of procurement pain? Our AI-powered platform automates the painful parts of identifying, qualifying, and responding to Canadian opportunities so you can focus on what you do best: delivering quality goods and services to government.
How Canadian Healthcare & Life Sciences Consultants Can Use Publicus as a MERX Biddingo Alternative to Find Government Contracts, Qualify Government RFPs Faster, and Avoid Missing High‑Value Municipal Government RFPs Canada Opportunities
Canadian Healthcare, AI in Healthcare
```html
How Canadian Healthcare & Life Sciences Consultants Can Find Government Contracts, Qualify Government RFPs Faster, and Avoid Missing High-Value Municipal Government Opportunities
Canadian healthcare and life sciences consultants operating in a fragmented government procurement landscape face unprecedented challenges in discovering and qualifying relevant opportunities. With government contracts representing a critical revenue stream—particularly as public sector healthcare spending drives demand for specialized consulting services—the ability to efficiently navigate government RFP processes has become essential to business growth. This comprehensive guide explores how consultants can leverage government contract discovery tools, master the qualification process for federal and provincial opportunities, and implement systematic approaches to capturing high-value municipal government RFPs across Canada.
The Canadian government procurement system encompasses federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal tiers, each with distinct processes, platforms, and decision-making criteria. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in healthcare and life sciences face particular challenges: fragmented opportunity discovery across 30+ websites, time-consuming manual qualification of 100+ page RFPs, inefficient proposal writing processes, and the constant risk of missing lucrative opportunities due to process complexity. Understanding how to navigate this ecosystem and implement scalable systems for opportunity discovery and qualification can transform government contracting from a sporadic revenue source into a predictable, repeatable business channel.
Understanding Canada's Government Procurement Landscape and the Healthcare Sector Opportunity
The Government of Canada spends approximately $37 billion annually on goods and services on behalf of federal departments and agencies, with Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) handling more than 75% of these purchases. However, significant additional procurement occurs at provincial, territorial, and municipal levels, creating a total addressable market far exceeding federal opportunities alone. For healthcare and life sciences consultants specifically, opportunities emerge across multiple government entities including Health Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada, provincial health ministries, public hospitals, academic medical centers, and municipal health departments.
According to government contract analysis data, the Government of Canada spent an estimated $2.3 billion in 2021-2022 on medical contracts alone. This represents a substantial market opportunity for healthcare consulting firms offering services in areas including health systems optimization, clinical trial management, diagnostics, medical device integration, and public health program development. The life sciences sector specifically has attracted increasing government investment as part of broader federal and provincial initiatives to build domestic biomanufacturing capacity, support innovation adoption, and strengthen healthcare supply chains. The Ontario Life Sciences Scale-Up Fund, for example, targets small-to-medium-sized life sciences enterprises seeking to commercialize market-ready products and prepare for procurement opportunities with government health systems.
Primary Government Procurement Platforms: CanadaBuys, MERX, Biddingo, and Provincial Systems
Successful government contract pursuit requires understanding where opportunities are posted and how each platform operates. Multiple overlapping platforms create both opportunities and challenges for consultants seeking comprehensive market visibility.
CanadaBuys: The Federal Gateway
CanadaBuys, operated by Public Services and Procurement Canada, represents the primary official channel for federal procurement opportunities. Operating on the SAP Ariba cloud-based procurement platform, CanadaBuys publishes all federal government requirements valued above $25,000 for goods or $40,000 for services and construction. This platform replaced the previous BuyandSell system and provides suppliers with access to tender opportunities from federal departments and agencies, Crown corporations, provincial public sector organizations, and international entities including the NATO Support and Procurement Agency.
CanadaBuys offers several critical features for healthcare and life sciences consultants. Users can search and filter opportunities by keywords, category, notice type, status, location, published date, and closing date. The platform includes opportunities from federal agencies, provincial departments, cities, hospitals, and universities. Email notification subscriptions enable consultants to receive updates on new opportunities matching specific criteria without manually checking the platform daily. Crucially, consultants must register their business in SAP Ariba to access these opportunities, requiring a business number from the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and completion of the Supplier Registration Information (SRI) system profile to obtain a procurement business number (PBN).
MERX: Canada's Commercial Aggregator
MERX operates as Canada's primary private-sector aggregator of government bid opportunities, compiling opportunities from federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal sources into a single searchable database. MERX serves as the designated aggregator for multiple provinces including Manitoba, where all tenders over Trade Agreement thresholds are distributed through this platform on behalf of government agencies. The platform provides access to thousands of active business opportunities across construction services, maintenance and repair, professional services, equipment leasing, electrical and electronics categories, and numerous others.
MERX distinguishes itself through several features particularly valuable for consultants seeking systematic opportunity discovery. The platform enables creation of opportunity profiles matched to specific business characteristics, with automatic email notifications delivering relevant opportunities as they are posted. Advanced filtering capabilities allow users to identify opportunities by industry, location, contract value, and opportunity type. Market intelligence features provide business analysis data helping contractors identify key buying periods and upcoming procurement initiatives. The platform also supports electronic bid submission, reducing administrative burden associated with proposal delivery. Pricing varies from a free "Basic" option with pay-as-you-go submission access to tiered subscription plans ($60-$160 monthly) offering different levels of notification frequency and advanced features.
Biddingo: Combining Government and Private Opportunities
Biddingo represents another aggregator platform bridging gaps between government and private sector contracting opportunities. The platform features a blend of public and private projects across municipal, provincial, housing, education, and corporate sectors throughout Canada. Biddingo maintains an archive of over 30,000 historical bids complemented by daily search capabilities and email notification services. A distinguishing feature involves profile alignment capabilities, allowing companies to match their profiles with relevant opportunities directly within the platform.
Biddingo differentiates itself through research assistance provided on behalf of small and medium-sized enterprises. Rather than requiring users to conduct extensive manual searches across dozens of sites, Biddingo conducts research across hundreds of sources daily, filtering results to surface only the most relevant opportunities to each registered company. This approach reduces the overwhelm associated with the proliferation of procurement sources while enabling smarter opportunity prioritization. The platform also facilitates side-by-side bid comparisons and provides comprehensive company-wide analytics for tracking past cost data and relationship interactions.
Provincial and Territorial Procurement Systems
Beyond federal systems, each Canadian province and territory maintains separate procurement portals with distinct processes and requirements. Ontario operates the Ontario Tenders Portal, a free resource for viewing and bidding on opportunities with provincial agencies and healthcare organizations. The Government of Alberta uses the Alberta Purchasing Connection (APC) as its official electronic tendering system, with Procurement Services handling most goods and construction procurements. British Columbia posts opportunities through BC Bid, where over 700 provincial public sector organizations publish notices. Manitoba primarily uses MERX as its distribution channel. Provincial systems typically differ in search functionality, submission requirements, and evaluation criteria, necessitating separate registration and process familiarization for each jurisdiction where consultants seek opportunities.
Navigating the Government RFP Process: From Discovery to Qualification
The government request for proposal (RFP) process follows distinct phases with specific requirements and timelines that differ substantially from private sector procurement. Understanding these phases enables consultants to allocate resources effectively and avoid common disqualification scenarios.
Phase One: Understanding RFP Structure and Mandatory Requirements
Government RFPs typically contain several mandatory sections establishing legal, technical, and commercial requirements. Most RFPs begin with general information detailing the purpose, key events, contract term, and work location. A statement of need section describes the requirement, often including background information, objectives aligned to SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Time-limited), and specific tasks to be accomplished. Submission requirements sections specify administrative, technical, and financial submission formats, including required documentation, number of copies needed, and submission procedures. Evaluation and award criteria sections disclose how proposals will be scored, typically separating administrative pass-fail requirements from technical and financial components with specified weightings.
Critically, government RFPs often specify that failure to meet mandatory requirements results in automatic disqualification regardless of proposal quality or pricing. This reality makes careful qualification and compliance verification non-negotiable before proposal development resources are invested. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), governing U.S. federal procurement, establishes similar principles emphasizing strict compliance with solicitation requirements. While FAR applies to American government contracting, many Canadian consultants serving cross-border clients face similar compliance demands. Canadian procurement follows principles outlined in the Directive on the Management of Procurement and the Government Contracts Regulations, emphasizing fairness, openness, and transparency while requiring responsive and responsible bidder evaluation.
Phase Two: Qualification Assessment
Before committing substantial proposal development resources to an RFP, consultants should systematically qualify opportunities against predefined criteria. Effective qualification frameworks assess multiple dimensions including strategic fit, capability alignment, resource availability, competitive positioning, and financial viability. Strategic fit examines whether the opportunity aligns with the firm's long-term business direction and serves core customer segments. Capability alignment assesses whether the firm possesses the technical expertise, industry experience, certifications, and staffing capacity required by the RFP. Resource availability determines whether the firm can dedicate necessary staff to proposal development and, if successful, contract delivery within stated timelines. Competitive positioning evaluates whether the firm possesses clear differentiators versus likely competitors or benefits from incumbent advantages. Financial viability ensures the opportunity justifies the investment in proposal development and can generate acceptable profit margins if awarded.
Healthcare and life sciences consultants should additionally assess whether opportunities align with sector priorities and government strategic objectives. For example, opportunities prioritizing domestic manufacturing capacity, clinical trial acceleration, health innovation adoption, or supply chain resilience may attract preferential evaluation treatment or social benefit criteria weighting. Understanding these strategic context factors enables consultants to position proposals more competitively and identify which opportunities warrant maximum effort.
Phase Three: Managing RFP Response Complexity
Once an opportunity passes qualification, systematic proposal development becomes critical. Government proposal teams report spending more than seven hours developing the first draft of a single proposal, according to recent Deltek research. This substantial time commitment reflects the depth of analysis required to address comprehensive RFP requirements while maintaining compliance with strict formatting, page limit, and submission specifications. Complex RFP structures containing hundreds of requirements spread across multiple sections make manual compliance tracking difficult and error-prone.
Effective proposal management requires establishing formal project structures with clear roles, defined timelines, and systematic review processes. Proposal teams typically include a response lead responsible for overall coordination, subject matter experts (SMEs) providing technical insight into specific requirements, sales representatives contributing market knowledge and client context, and compliance/legal resources ensuring adherence to contractual and regulatory obligations. Successful firms develop standardized templates and modular proposal components—case studies, capability overviews, team biographies, certifications, and similar materials—that can be rapidly adapted to specific RFP requirements rather than developing responses from scratch.
Advanced Tools and Approaches for RFP Qualification and Response
Emerging artificial intelligence and automation technologies offer consultants opportunities to substantially reduce time spent on RFP discovery, qualification, and proposal development while improving response quality and compliance.
AI-Powered RFP Analysis and Requirement Extraction
AI-driven proposal solutions address common bottlenecks in government procurement response. These platforms use machine learning to automatically extract requirements from RFP documents, identify key evaluation criteria, detect mandatory versus desirable requirements, and organize information into structured matrices for easy reference during proposal development. Multi-document requirement analysis—extracting, organizing, and categorizing contractual requirements from complex multi-section RFPs—traditionally consumes 25 hours or more of manual effort. Advanced AI approaches reduce this process to minutes, automatically identifying compliance gaps and highlighting risk areas requiring SME attention before proposal submission.
For healthcare and life sciences consultants specifically, AI analysis can identify sector-specific requirements such as clinical trial qualifications, healthcare compliance certifications (HIPAA, provincial privacy legislation), medical device experience, regulatory approval expertise, or public health emergency response capabilities. This targeted requirement identification enables faster capability-to-requirement mapping and more precise proposal positioning.
Intelligent Bid/No-Bid Decision Support
Consultants facing dozens or hundreds of potential opportunities monthly benefit from systematic bid/no-bid decision frameworks supported by data analysis. Rather than pursuing every opportunity matching a general industry category, data-driven qualification reduces wasted effort on low-probability pursuits. Effective frameworks combine strategic fit assessment, capability alignment scoring, competitive landscape analysis, and past performance trending. Consultants tracking their proposal-to-contract win rates can identify which opportunity types, customer segments, and geographic markets generate highest returns on proposal development investment, enabling more disciplined opportunity targeting.
AI-enhanced bid/no-bid analysis can incorporate historical data from thousands of past procurements to identify patterns distinguishing frequently-awarded versus rarely-awarded requirements, helping consultants make more informed qualification decisions. For healthcare and life sciences firms, this analysis might reveal that opportunities emphasizing manufacturing capacity development show different success patterns than those focused on service delivery, or that certain provincial health systems demonstrate significantly higher award rates to repeat vendors versus new entrants.
Proposal Automation and Content Generation
Recent developments in AI-powered proposal writing enable consultants to generate first-draft responses to RFP requirements in minutes rather than hours. These tools combine RFP requirement analysis with institutional knowledge bases—past proposals, case studies, team biographies, capability statements—to generate proposal content addressing specific requirements while maintaining organizational voice and strategic positioning. Automation does not replace professional proposal writing; rather, it accelerates the drafting process by eliminating repetitive manual content generation, allowing human proposal managers to focus on strategy, competitive differentiation, and quality assurance.
Purpose-built solutions for government contracting incorporate knowledge of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requirements, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) obligations, and Canadian Directive on the Management of Procurement specifications, automatically flagging compliance risks during draft generation. These systems maintain clean separation between data used for proposal generation and the content sources themselves, addressing security concerns associated with generic large language models that might inadvertently incorporate unrelated training data into sensitive government proposals.
Healthcare and Life Sciences-Specific Procurement Pathways
Healthcare and life sciences consultants should understand specialized procurement vehicles designed specifically for professional services within these sectors.
Solutions-Based and Task-Based Informatics Professional Services
Public Services and Procurement Canada offers Solutions-Based Informatics Professional Services (SBIPS) and Task-Based Informatics Professional Services (TBIPS) frameworks enabling consultants to provide specialized expertise without undergoing full competitive procurement processes for each engagement. These methods of supply comprise services and, in certain situations, essential goods, with suppliers defining and providing solutions to specific requirements while accepting responsibility for project outcomes. SBIPS and TBIPS frameworks typically establish standing offers or supply arrangements with pre-qualified suppliers, enabling government departments to issue task orders or call-ups as needs arise without additional competitive solicitation.
Consultants qualifying for SBIPS or TBIPS arrangements gain access to ongoing opportunity flow from government agencies within defined service domains. Recent updates to contracting policy have increased delegated contracting authority under these frameworks to $37.5 million for services across PSPC (with other departments holding authority up to $3.75 million), substantially expanding the value of opportunities available to pre-qualified suppliers. Healthcare and life sciences consultants with expertise in informatics, health systems analysis, clinical trial support, regulatory navigation, or pandemic preparedness may find strong alignment with these procurement vehicles.
Professional Services Procurement Under $100,000
Government contracting officers can procure up to $100,000 of professional services and real property consulting services without publishing requirements on CanadaBuys. These opportunities appear only in specialized databases accessible to registered suppliers in the Supplier Registration Information (SRI) system. While individual contract values fall below those of formal published RFPs, the cumulative opportunity represented by hundreds of sub-$100,000 procurements across federal departments can be substantial. These opportunities also typically involve faster decision-making and less formalized evaluation processes than published RFPs, potentially offering faster sales cycles for consultants pursuing them systematically.
Standing Offers for Professional Services
Standing offers represent pre-established agreements between government and qualified suppliers, with predefined terms and conditions enabling rapid call-ups as needs arise. Unlike indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts common in U.S. federal procurement, standing offers do not legally bind parties—neither the supplier is obligated to fulfill orders nor the government obligated to place them. However, winning a standing offer place provides access to multiple years of potential call-up opportunities, creating significant revenue visibility for successful suppliers.
Systematic Approaches to Avoiding Missed Opportunities
Missing high-value government opportunities represents a significant competitive risk for consultants lacking systematic discovery processes. Several strategies mitigate this risk while building competitive advantage.
Multi-Platform Subscription and Notification Management
Rather than manually checking multiple procurement platforms daily, consultants should establish systematic email notification subscriptions across CanadaBuys, provincial platforms, MERX, Biddingo, and specialized databases. Notifications should be configured to deliver opportunities matching specific industry keywords, geographic areas, and service categories relevant to the consultant's expertise. Regular review and refinement of notification criteria ensures relevance while preventing alert fatigue. Consultants discovering they consistently ignore particular opportunity categories should disable notifications for those categories, concentrating attention on viable prospects.
Relationship Development with Procurement Officers
Government procurement officers represent valuable information sources about upcoming opportunities, evaluation priorities, and capability requirements. While strict limitations on communications between potential bidders and procurement personnel during formal solicitation periods prevent inappropriate influence attempts, pre-solicitation relationship-building provides legitimate competitive advantage. Consultants identifying which government departments and agencies purchase services within their expertise domains can establish relationships with relevant procurement officers, attend pre-proposal conferences, and participate in industry feedback sessions informing procurement strategy development.
The Office of the Procurement Ombudsman has emphasized the importance of bridge-building between government procurement officials and industry, noting that more open communication benefits both sides by enabling suppliers to understand requirements and priorities while enabling government to receive responsive, compliant proposals addressing actual needs.
Market Tracking and Competitive Intelligence
Consultants should systematically monitor contract awards within their sectors and geographies to understand competitive landscapes, typical contract values, frequent winners, and evolving government priorities. Government of Canada contract data published on the Open Government Portal discloses contract awards over $10,000, including contractor names, values, and work descriptions. Provincial and municipal governments similarly publish award information. Regular analysis of this data reveals patterns indicating strategic procurement priorities and emerging opportunities aligned to government initiatives.
For example, tracking medical contract awards over several years revealed substantial growth in contracts with diagnostics firms, reflecting government efforts to build domestic testing capacity. Life sciences consultants identifying this trend could proactively develop capabilities and partnerships positioning them competitively for future diagnostics-related procurements.
Compliance, Fairness, and Ethical Considerations in Government Bidding
Government procurement operates under strict fairness and transparency principles, with non-compliance creating disqualification risk and reputational damage.
Mandatory Compliance Requirements and Common Disqualification Triggers
Canadian government RFPs establish mandatory compliance requirements that proposal evaluators apply uniformly across all submissions. Failure to provide required information, use incorrect submission format, include missing signatures, exceed specified page limits, or submit past stated deadlines results in automatic disqualification. These are not subjective assessments subject to reviewer discretion; they represent binary pass-fail gates applied identically to every proposal. Consultants must treat mandatory compliance requirements with absolute seriousness, implementing independent review procedures ensuring zero defects before submission.
The Procurement Ombudsman's office regularly receives complaints related to evaluation criteria perceived as unfair or overly restrictive, indicating widespread concern among bidders that evaluation approaches disadvantage certain supplier categories or lack clear justification. While consultants cannot change established evaluation criteria, understanding potential bias or transparency concerns may inform decisions about whether pursuing specific opportunities justifies resource investment.
Ethical Conduct and Code of Conduct Compliance
Consultants must comply with the Code of Conduct for Procurement, establishing ethical standards for all parties involved in government contracting. This includes prohibition on conflict of interest, insider information misuse, collusion with competitors, or inappropriate influence attempts. Violations create not only disqualification from specific procurements but potential debarment from future government contracting. Consultants should implement compliance training, maintain documented conflict-of-interest assessment procedures, and establish clear communication policies preventing communication violations during restricted periods.
Integration of Technology Solutions into Government Contracting Operations
Technology platforms aggregating opportunities, automating analysis, and supporting proposal development can substantially improve government contracting operational efficiency. However, technology adoption requires thoughtful implementation considering data security, compliance, and integration with existing business processes.
Platform Selection and Integration Considerations
Consultants evaluating technology solutions should assess several key dimensions. Data security and compliance requirements are paramount, particularly for healthcare consultants potentially handling sensitive health information during proposal development or contract delivery. Solutions should operate in secure environments meeting healthcare compliance standards and maintain clear data governance preventing unauthorized access or misuse. Integration capabilities with existing systems—CRM platforms, project management tools, financial systems—determine implementation friction and adoption likelihood.
Platforms aggregating opportunities from multiple sources (federal, provincial, municipal, private sector) reduce time spent checking multiple systems individually. Intelligent filtering capabilities enabling customization to specific opportunity criteria prevent alert fatigue while ensuring relevant opportunities reach decision-makers. Audit trails and compliance features helping teams track proposal development, maintain version control, and document compliance checks reduce risk of submission errors.
Artificial intelligence-powered features—requirement extraction, bid/no-bid assessment, first-draft generation, compliance checking—provide the greatest value in reducing manual effort. However, consultants should verify that AI implementations are specifically designed for government contracting rather than generic proposals, ensuring knowledge of government-specific terminology, compliance requirements, and evaluation approaches. Solutions built by former government procurement professionals or explicitly trained on government procurement datasets tend to outperform generic alternatives.
Change Management and Team Adoption
Technology implementation success depends on user adoption by proposal teams, SMEs, and business development professionals. Solutions perceived as adding complexity rather than reducing burden face adoption resistance. Effective implementation requires clear articulation of specific time-savings and workflow improvements, hands-on training enabling comfortable platform usage, and incentive structures rewarding systematic platform use versus ad-hoc workarounds. Leadership commitment to government contracting as a core business channel and willingness to invest in process improvement send strong signals supporting adoption.
Building a Sustainable Government Contracting Practice
Consultants seeking to grow government contracting as a significant revenue source should view this not as an opportunistic activity but as a distinct business practice with unique processes, timelines, and competencies requiring dedicated resources and systematic management.
Organizational Structure and Resource Allocation
Firms winning most of their projects via government RFPs typically employ dedicated proposal professionals whose primary responsibility involves developing RFP responses. This dedicated focus enables proposal managers to develop expertise in government procurement processes, maintain organized libraries of reusable proposal content, and manage simultaneous proposals at various development stages. Firms competing without dedicated resources—requiring billable staff to write proposals while managing client deliverables—face competitive disadvantage against better-resourced competitors and struggle maintaining response quality under time pressure.
The Procurement Ombudsman's consultations with experts revealed widespread recognition that federal procurement lacks adequate capacity and professionalization among procurement practitioners. This reality presents opportunity for consultants developing expertise in government procurement to position themselves as preferred partners to government agencies seeking specialized capabilities.
Capability Development and Market Positioning
Healthcare and life sciences consultants should strategically develop capabilities aligning with government priorities. Understanding federal and provincial strategic initiatives—health system modernization, clinical trial acceleration, diagnostic capacity building, pandemic preparedness, supply chain resilience—enables consultants to develop targeted expertise positioning them competitively for related procurements. Obtaining relevant certifications, publishing thought leadership addressing government priorities, and building case studies demonstrating success in government environments support market positioning.
The Ontario Life Sciences Scale-Up Fund specifically targets SMEs in commercialization and procurement preparation stages, suggesting government willingness to support capability development in life sciences. Consultants developing commercial expertise in targeted subsectors (oncology, animal health, diagnostics, medical devices) may access both government development support and preferential procurement consideration.
Conclusion: Building Competitive Advantage in Government Contracting
Canadian healthcare and life sciences consultants operate in a complex, multi-jurisdictional procurement environment offering substantial opportunity for firms implementing systematic approaches to opportunity discovery, qualification, and proposal development. Rather than treating government contracting as sporadic opportunistic activity, consultants should view this as a distinct business practice requiring dedicated resources, specialized expertise, and process discipline.
Success requires understanding the distinct platforms hosting opportunities at federal, provincial, and municipal levels; mastering the RFP qualification and response processes differing substantially from private sector procurement; building systematic approaches to opportunity discovery preventing missed opportunities; and maintaining strict compliance with government procurement ethics and regulations. Technology solutions aggregating fragmented opportunity sources, automating RFP analysis, supporting bid/no-bid decision-making, and accelerating proposal development can substantially improve operational efficiency and win rates.
Healthcare and life sciences represent particularly attractive government contracting markets given substantial government spending on medical services, strategic initiatives driving innovation adoption and domestic capacity building, and strong alignment between consultant capabilities and government priorities. Consultants who invest in developing government contracting expertise, building specialized healthcare and life sciences capabilities, and implementing systematic processes for opportunity management can build sustainable competitive advantage, generating predictable revenue streams and growth opportunities distinguishing them from competitors treating government sales as sporadic activity.
Sources
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sp-ps/clients/propositions-rfp-eng.html
https://ontariotenders.app.jaggaer.com/esop/nac-host/public/web/login.html
https://search.open.canada.ca/en/ct/?sort=contract_value_f+desc&page=1&search_text=%22LIFELABS%22
https://ontariotenders.bravosolution.com/esop/nac-host/public/web/login.html
https://www.deltek.com/en/government-contracting/guide/canadian-government-contracts
https://opo-boa.gc.ca/praapp-prorev/2023/epa-ppr-06-2023-eng.html
https://vanguardcanada.com/canadabuys-a-more-efficient-procurement-system/
https://www.ey.com/en_ca/insights/government-public-sector/modern-government-procurement
https://www.cbh.com/industries/government-contracting-consulting-services/
https://www.alberta.ca/contract-opportunities-with-the-government-of-alberta
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/oc-so-eng.html
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/spics-sbips-eng.html
https://www.same.org/news/guest-post-how-proposal-ai-can-solve-government-contracting-problems/
http://www.ontario.ca/page/life-sciences-scale-fund-program-guidelines
https://www.consultingsuccess.com/response-to-request-for-proposals
https://openasset.com/resources/construction-bidding-websites/
https://www.heyiris.ai/blog/streamlining-public-sector-rfi-rfp-responses-with-iris
https://www.gsa.gov/policy-regulations/regulations/federal-acquisition-regulation-far
https://govlab.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/gpl_rfp_guidebook_2021.pdf
https://opo-boa.gc.ca/rapports-reports/2024-2025/index-eng.html
https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/sme-research-statistics/en/key-small-business-statistics
```