Tired of procurement pain? Our AI-powered platform automates the painful parts of identifying, qualifying, and responding to Canadian opportunities so you can focus on what you do best: delivering quality goods and services to government.
How Canadian Engineering Consultancies Can Use Publicus RFP Automation Canada Tools to Find Government Contracts, Qualify Government RFPs Faster, and Avoid Missing High‑Value Federal Government Procurement and Municipal Government RFPs Canada Opportunities
RFP Automation, Government Contracts
```html
How Canadian Engineering Consultancies Can Use RFP Automation Tools to Find Government Contracts and Qualify Government RFPs Faster
Canadian engineering consultancies face unprecedented opportunities in government contracting. With over $37 billion in annual federal procurement spending combined with substantial provincial and municipal investment, the potential for growth is significant. However, accessing these government contracts requires navigating a complex, fragmented procurement ecosystem spanning federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal platforms. Engineering firms pursuing government RFPs must master the Government Contracts landscape, understand Government Procurement best practices, and leverage AI Government Procurement Software to compete effectively. This comprehensive guide explores how engineering consultancies can use RFP Automation Canada tools and procurement software solutions to streamline the Government RFP Process, avoid missing high-value Federal Government Procurement opportunities, and win Municipal Government RFPs Canada contracts with greater efficiency and success rates.
Understanding Canada's Complex Procurement Landscape for Engineering Services
The Canadian government procurement system operates across three distinct levels: federal, provincial, and municipal. Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC), which manages the central purchasing function, coordinates approximately $37 billion in annual federal procurement spending on behalf of federal departments and agencies. This represents one of the largest purchasing forces in the country, yet the complexity of accessing these opportunities challenges even experienced engineering firms. The Government of Canada procurement process operates through multiple channels and mechanisms, each with unique requirements, timelines, and evaluation methodologies that engineers must understand to succeed.
Federal procurement opportunities are published on CanadaBuys, the official federal procurement platform that replaced previous systems. Most federal government contracts valued above $25,000 for goods or $40,000 for services and construction are published through CanadaBuys and subject to competitive bidding requirements. The federal system requires suppliers to register with the Supplier Registration Information (SRI) system and obtain a Procurement Business Number (PBN) to participate in certain procurement vehicles. Additionally, businesses must register in SAP Ariba to access opportunities posted through PSPC's electronic procurement solution.
Beyond federal opportunities, provincial governments maintain autonomous procurement systems with distinct platforms, policies, and evaluation criteria. Ontario's Tender Opportunities Portal manages provincial purchasing, British Columbia operates BC Bid, Alberta utilizes the Alberta Purchasing Connection, and other provinces maintain separate systems. Each provincial government controls procurement thresholds, supplier registration requirements, and evaluation methodologies independently. At the municipal level, individual cities and regional authorities post opportunities through platforms including MERX, Biddingo, and municipal-specific SAP Ariba portals. This fragmentation across 30+ distinct tender portals creates substantial challenges for engineering consultancies attempting to discover, qualify, and respond to relevant opportunities systematically.
The Engineering Consultancy Challenge: Fragmentation, Volume, and Time Constraints
Canadian engineering consultancies face significant barriers when pursuing government contracts through traditional manual processes. Research on government procurement reveals that smaller and medium-sized engineering firms miss 72 to 78 percent of relevant RFP opportunities in their market segments through conventional discovery methods. This discovery failure reflects both the volume and complexity of monitoring multiple procurement platforms simultaneously, combined with the time-intensive nature of manual opportunity assessment. When engineering consultancies receive RFP notifications across federal, provincial, and municipal sources, team members must individually evaluate each solicitation against the firm's capabilities, strategic priorities, market positioning, and resource availability.
The challenge compounds significantly when considering the complexity of individual federal government RFPs. Federal government procurement documents frequently exceed 100 pages and contain intricate mandatory requirements evaluated on a pass-fail basis. A single failure to meet mandatory criteria results in automatic disqualification, regardless of the quality of the technical proposal. The Treasury Board Secretariat emphasizes this stringency through policy directives requiring that proposals be evaluated according to predetermined evaluation criteria disclosed in the solicitation. Common mandatory requirements for engineering services include demonstrating financial stability through audited statements, holding specific security clearances such as Reliability Status or Secret clearance obtained through the Contract Security Program, compliance with the Procurement Strategy for Indigenous Business in certain circumstances, and adherence to policies including the COVID-19 Vaccination Policy for Supplier Personnel where applicable.
Additionally, engineering consultancies must understand that federal procurement operates through several distinct mechanisms beyond standard RFPs. National Master Standing Offers (NMSO) enable pre-qualified suppliers to bid on cross-departmental initiatives through simplified call-up processes. Regional Master Standing Offers (RMSO) focus on provincial priorities requiring local workforce participation commitments. Departmental Individual Standing Offers (DISO) handle PSPC-exclusive contracts with specific technical mandates such as Building Information Modeling (BIM) compliance requirements. Supply Arrangements create pre-qualified supplier pools from which government clients solicit competitive bids for specific requirements. Professional services procurement operates through specialized systems including the Centralized Professional Services System (CPSS) and ProServices for IT and consulting services valued below specific thresholds. This institutional complexity means that engineering consultancies pursuing government contracts must understand not only how to respond to individual RFPs, but also how to position themselves across multiple procurement vehicles and standing offer arrangements.
RFP Automation and Government Contract Discovery: Addressing the Fragmentation Problem
Modern procurement technology platforms address the fragmentation challenge by automating the discovery process across multiple sources. Rather than requiring manual monitoring of separate platforms using different search interfaces and terminology, intelligent aggregation systems consolidate opportunities from 30+ Canadian sources in unified dashboards with standardized categorization. These platforms employ natural language processing to extract key requirements from RFP documents, classify opportunities by industry codes consistent with North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) standards, identify evaluation criteria, and extract mandatory eligibility requirements. For engineering consultancies, this automated extraction captures critical information including project budget ranges, required professional licensure and certifications, prior project experience thresholds, team composition requirements, and specific technical qualifications such as security clearance needs or Indigenous partnership requirements.
The aggregation capability proves particularly valuable given the complexity of monitoring provincial and municipal procurement separately. Ontario's government procurement operates through distinct platforms for provincial purchasing versus broader public sector organizations including hospitals, school boards, and municipalities. British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and other provinces each maintain independent systems with unique search interfaces and notification mechanisms. Municipal procurement through platforms like MERX and Biddingo requires separate searches and often lacks the standardized categorization found on federal systems. AI-driven aggregation tools eliminate the need for separate searches across these disparate systems by consolidating opportunities in a single dashboard where engineering firms can filter by project type, location, budget range, and other criteria relevant to their service offerings.
Beyond simple aggregation, modern procurement software applies machine learning algorithms trained on historical government contracting data to predict opportunity alignment with specific firm profiles. These systems analyze NAICS codes associated with the firm, geographic service areas, project types completed, team credentials, and performance history to rapidly assess go/no-go decisions. When an engineering consultancy uploads its capability profile into such systems, the artificial intelligence evaluates each new RFP posting against these parameters and generates qualification recommendations with supporting rationale. This predictive capability addresses a fundamental challenge in government contracting: distinguishing between opportunities the firm can realistically win versus those requiring capabilities outside the organization's current scope or capacity.
Qualification Efficiency: Automating RFP Assessment and Compliance Verification
Once opportunities are identified, qualifying them for pursuit requires analyzing extensive RFP documents to determine alignment with organizational capabilities and mandatory requirements. Engineering consultancies typically invest substantial resources reviewing federal government RFPs to identify mandatory criteria, point-rated evaluation factors, submission requirements, and compliance obligations. This qualification process has historically consumed 8 to 12 hours per RFP even for experienced proposal teams, as reviewers must cross-reference requirements across multiple document sections, identify gaps between stated requirements and organizational capabilities, and assess the likelihood of winning against probable competitive responses.
Artificial intelligence tools streamline this qualification process by automatically extracting requirements from RFP documents and cross-referencing them against firm documentation and capabilities. When AI systems identify missing compliance elements or potential capability gaps before final submission, firms can correct these deficiencies rather than discovering disqualification after the deadline. For engineering consultancies pursuing federal contracts subject to stringent mandatory requirement evaluation, this preventive approach proves particularly valuable. Rather than relying on individual proposal writers to remember every compliance requirement within a 100+ page solicitation, systematic technology-enabled compliance verification provides consistent quality assurance across multiple simultaneous proposals.
Compliance checking systems address specific requirements frequently encountered in engineering RFPs, including security clearance needs, professional licensure requirements, insurance coverage specifications, bonding requirements, and policy compliance declarations. Federal government contracts typically require compliance with clauses from the Standard Acquisition Clauses and Conditions (SACC) Manual, which addresses matters including intellectual property protection, confidentiality, workplace equity certification, and contract administration procedures. Provincial and municipal RFPs frequently impose additional requirements specific to local procurement policies, environmental standards, accessibility compliance under the Accessible Canada Act, or local content preferences. Automated compliance checking eliminates the risk that proposal teams overlook these requirements, which could result in disqualification or contract performance issues.
Streamlining Proposal Development: From Blank Pages to Strategic Responses
The RFP response process traditionally consumes substantial resources within engineering consultancies. Research on proposal development indicates that architecture and engineering firms invest an average of 32 hours to develop a single RFP response, translating to approximately 25 minutes per question across complex 100+ page solicitations. For firms responding to multiple federal government RFPs simultaneously while managing ongoing client delivery, this time investment creates a significant operational constraint. Many engineering consultancies must choose between responding to fewer opportunities with higher quality proposals or pursuing broader opportunity coverage with less customized responses.
AI proposal generation tools address this timeline challenge by automating routine proposal components and generating initial drafts from firm knowledge bases. When an engineering consultancy uploads historical proposal content, case studies, project descriptions, team credentials, and standard methodology language into AI systems, these platforms can generate initial RFP responses that address 60 to 80 percent of evaluation criteria automatically. Rather than beginning with blank pages, proposal teams inherit draft documents containing preliminary project understanding, approach descriptions, relevant case studies, and qualification narratives. Subject matter experts then focus on customization, strategic positioning, and technical refinement rather than creating content from scratch. This workflow division compresses proposal development from 32 hours to approximately 4 to 5 hours per response, enabling firms to respond to significantly more opportunities with consistent quality.
For federal government contracts requiring standardized compliance with Treasury Board policies and SACC provisions, automated proposal generation particularly accelerates response development. Federal RFPs typically follow predictable structures with sections addressing mandatory technical requirements, point-rated evaluation criteria, past performance demonstrations, team qualifications, security clearance compliance, and financial proposals. AI systems trained on federal procurement standards can populate these standard sections with firm-specific information, allowing proposal teams to focus effort on differentiating technical approaches and demonstrating competitive advantage. This approach proves especially valuable when engineering consultancies pursue multiple simultaneous opportunities, as the AI system maintains consistency across proposals while enabling rapid response to strict submission deadlines.
Best Practices for Engineering Consultancies Pursuing Government Contracts
Successful engineering consultancies pursuing Canadian government contracts implement several foundational practices that technology tools can significantly enhance. The first critical practice involves developing a comprehensive understanding of organizational capabilities and strategic positioning before pursuing specific government opportunities. Engineering firms should document their service offerings, technical expertise, project experience, team qualifications, security clearance status, and capacity constraints in standardized formats that can be readily uploaded into procurement technology systems. This foundational work enables automated systems to accurately assess opportunity alignment rather than requiring manual qualification analysis for each RFP.
Second, engineering consultancies must establish systematic processes for discovering and evaluating government opportunities before committing substantial proposal resources. Rather than responding to every RFP circulated through procurement portals, successful firms implement go/no-go decision processes that candidly assess whether the organization can realistically meet all mandatory requirements, deliver technical solutions superior to likely competitors, and price competitively. Research indicates that organizations using formalized go/no-go decision templates achieve significantly higher win rates than those pursuing every available opportunity. Technology platforms that aggregate opportunities and provide go/no-go recommendations based on organizational profile alignment support this discipline by enabling rapid evaluation of numerous opportunities before substantial proposal effort investment.
Third, engineering consultancies should prioritize opportunities aligned with their proven past performance and market positioning. Federal government contracts heavily weight past performance in evaluation, with PSPC evaluation criteria typically allocating substantial points to demonstrated success on similar projects. Engineering firms with strong track records on specific project types, in particular geographic regions, or serving specific government clients enjoy significant competitive advantages. Procurement technology systems that enable consultancies to systematically track past performance, organize relevant project case studies, and match these examples to current opportunities enhance the ability to highlight competitive strengths.
Fourth, successful firms maintain current compliance documentation for mandatory federal government requirements. Security clearance status, professional licensure verification, financial stability documentation, workplace equity certifications, and insurance coverage specifications require ongoing maintenance. Federal procurement regulations require contracting authorities to verify these certifications at all times, and failure to maintain current documentation can render standing offers or pre-qualified supplier positions inactive. Technology systems that track compliance document expiration dates and alert firms when renewal windows approach prevent disqualification due to administrative oversights.
Leveraging Technology for Competitive Advantage in Government Contracting
Engineering consultancies that integrate RFP automation tools into their business development processes achieve measurable competitive advantages. Technology-enabled opportunity discovery reduces the likelihood of missing relevant government contracts, addressing the documented challenge that traditional manual monitoring results in 72 to 78 percent opportunity misses. Consultancies using aggregated procurement platforms can monitor federal, provincial, and municipal opportunities simultaneously, ensuring no significant contract opportunities escape attention due to platform fragmentation.
Automated qualification systems enable engineering consultancies to respond to higher volumes of opportunities without proportionally increasing proposal team staffing. Rather than restricting proposal responses to opportunities senior team members have capacity to personally evaluate, technology-enabled qualification allows broader opportunity evaluation with consistent rigor. This capability proves particularly valuable for mid-sized engineering consultancies competing against both larger firms with dedicated government contracting departments and smaller firms with limited proposal resources. Technology enables these firms to punch above their weight by systematically evaluating opportunities that manual processes would overlook due to bandwidth constraints.
Accelerated proposal development timelines created through AI-assisted content generation enable engineering consultancies to meet compressed RFP response windows without compromising quality. Federal government RFPs frequently allow only 15 to 30 days for proposal submission, creating scheduling challenges for consultancies attempting to balance ongoing client delivery with new business development. Technology platforms that generate draft proposals within hours rather than requiring weeks of proposal team effort enable rapid response to opportunities announced with limited lead time.
Technology platforms also support more sophisticated competitive positioning strategies. By reducing the administrative burden of opportunity discovery and basic proposal assembly, engineering consultancies can allocate proposal team effort toward strategic differentiation, competitive analysis, and client value articulation. Rather than consuming proposal team time on routine compliance documentation and standard technical descriptions, subject matter experts focus on explaining why the firm's approach uniquely addresses the client's challenges and delivers superior value compared to competitive proposals.
Addressing the Compliance and Risk Management Dimension
Canadian government procurement operates within a highly regulated framework encompassing the Financial Administration Act, Government Contracts Regulations, Treasury Board Contracting Policy, and multiple international trade agreements. Engineering consultancies must ensure proposals comply with this regulatory framework while meeting specific mandatory requirements in each solicitation. Non-compliance with mandatory requirements results in automatic disqualification, while failure to address specific regulatory obligations can invalidate contracts or expose firms to legal liability following award.
Technology-enabled compliance assurance addresses this dimension through systematic requirement extraction and verification. Federal government contracts must include mandatory clauses addressing intellectual property rights, confidentiality obligations, security protocols, workplace equity, and contract administration procedures per the SACC Manual. Provincial and municipal contracts may impose additional requirements specific to local procurement policies or strategic objectives. Automated compliance checking systems cross-reference these regulatory requirements against RFP documents and proposal drafts, generating gap reports that identify missing elements before submission. This preventive approach eliminates disqualifications resulting from overlooked compliance requirements.
Risk assessment capabilities within technology platforms enable engineering consultancies to evaluate financial and operational risks associated with specific government contracts before committing to pursuit. Federal government contracts frequently include change order provisions, audit rights extending several years beyond contract completion, and performance requirements subject to stringent verification. Technology platforms can flag these risk elements, enabling proposal teams to assess whether contract terms align with organizational risk tolerance before submitting proposals.
Integration with Existing Business Processes and Systems
Effective adoption of RFP automation technology requires integration with existing engineering consultancy business processes. Rather than implementing standalone procurement tools that operate independently from proposal development, project management, and financial systems, successful firms integrate technology into established workflows. This integration requires identifying how opportunity information flows from discovery systems to proposal development teams, how organizational knowledge bases containing past performance examples and technical methodologies are structured and maintained, and how proposal team assignments and resource allocation decisions are made.
Engineering consultancies should begin technology adoption by conducting a content audit of existing proposal materials, case studies, and technical methodologies. This audit identifies high-quality content suitable for AI-assisted proposal generation, reveals gaps in documentation that should be addressed before implementation, and establishes baseline content organization standards. Subsequent technology implementation focuses on capturing this organizational knowledge in formats that AI systems can effectively process and retrieve, enabling rapid proposal draft generation.
Successful firms also establish governance processes for AI-generated proposal content. While technology can rapidly generate draft proposals addressing 60 to 80 percent of evaluation criteria, human expertise remains essential for ensuring accuracy, appropriateness, and strategic positioning. Engineering consultancy leadership should define review processes, approval workflows, and quality assurance standards for AI-generated content. These processes ensure that proposals maintain professional standards while capturing the efficiency benefits that technology enables.
Structuring Effective RFP Responses: Technical Excellence and Compliance Integration
Engineering consultancies pursuing federal government contracts must balance technical excellence with strict compliance to evaluation requirements. Federal government RFPs typically specify evaluation criteria weighted between technical merit (60 to 70 percent) and price (30 to 40 percent), with some procurements emphasizing technical capabilities more heavily depending on project complexity. Engineering proposals should demonstrate the firm's approach to project delivery, team qualifications and relevant experience, risk mitigation strategies, quality assurance methodologies, and sustainability commitments if applicable.
Mandatory requirements demand particular attention, as failure to address any single mandatory criterion results in disqualification regardless of proposal quality. Engineering consultancies should create requirement matrices mapping each mandatory requirement to specific proposal sections, enabling proposal reviewers to verify that all requirements receive direct attention. For federal government infrastructure contracts, mandatory requirements frequently include demonstrating financial stability, holding required security clearances, maintaining appropriate insurance coverage, confirming professional licensure for key team members, and providing evidence of capacity to meet project schedules.
Point-rated evaluation criteria differentiate among compliant proposals, enabling consultancies to emphasize competitive strengths. These criteria might address technical approach innovation, past performance on similar projects, project team qualifications, risk mitigation comprehensiveness, or sustainability considerations. Engineering proposals should explicitly address each point-rated criterion with specific examples demonstrating how the firm's proposal excels in these areas compared to typical competitive responses. Technology platforms that extract evaluation criteria and flag these sections within proposals ensure proposal writers address all rated factors with appropriate emphasis.
Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements: Strategic Positioning for Recurring Opportunities
Engineering consultancies pursuing sustainable government revenue streams should prioritize establishing positions on federal Standing Offers and Supply Arrangements rather than relying solely on individual RFP responses. Standing Offers represent agreements between the federal government and pre-qualified suppliers to provide specified goods or services at pre-arranged prices when requested. While Standing Offers are not contracts until the government issues a call-up, achieving Standing Offer status provides engineering consultancies with recurring business opportunities, predictable revenue streams, and reduced bidding overhead for subsequent requirements within the Standing Offer scope.
National Master Standing Offers (NMSO) enable pre-qualified engineering consultancies to bid on cross-departmental initiatives through simplified call-up processes, while Regional Master Standing Offers (RMSO) focus on provincial priorities with local workforce participation requirements. Professional services procurement operates through specialized standing offer systems including the Centralized Professional Services System (CPSS) and ProServices for IT consulting and specialized professional services. Engineering consultancies should research available Standing Offer opportunities aligned with their service offerings, understand specific capability requirements and evaluation criteria, and develop comprehensive Standing Offer proposals demonstrating sustained capability, documented past performance, and competitive pricing.
Recent analysis indicates that 38 percent of federal infrastructure spending flows through Standing Offers, making mastery of these mechanisms essential for engineering firms pursuing sustained government contracts. Technology platforms that track Standing Offer renewal dates, alert firms when evaluation windows approach, and assist with Standing Offer proposal development enhance the ability to establish and maintain these valuable pre-qualified supplier positions.
Provincial and Municipal Government Opportunities: Tailoring Strategies to Distinct Procurement Systems
Engineering consultancies should develop distinct strategies for provincial and municipal government opportunities, as procurement processes, evaluation methodologies, and strategic priorities vary significantly across jurisdictions. Ontario's government procurement emphasizes value-for-money considerations beyond simple price, while other provinces may emphasize local preference or specific policy objectives. Municipal procurement frequently prioritizes local business participation, accessibility compliance, or environmental sustainability. Understanding these distinct procurement approaches enables engineering consultancies to tailor proposals to specific government client priorities rather than submitting standardized responses to all opportunities.
Technology platforms that segregate opportunities by government level and jurisdiction enable engineering consultancies to focus on markets aligned with their geographic service areas and technical specializations. Rather than pursuing municipal opportunities across Canada, consultancies can concentrate on municipalities within established service regions where the firm has proven past performance and established relationships. This focused approach typically produces higher win rates than dispersed pursuit of opportunities across numerous jurisdictions.
Conclusion: Transforming Engineering Consultancy Growth Through Procurement Technology
Canadian engineering consultancies face unprecedented opportunities in government contracting, with over $37 billion in federal procurement spending combined with substantial provincial and municipal investment. However, accessing these opportunities through traditional manual processes creates significant barriers, particularly for mid-sized firms competing against both larger competitors with dedicated government contracting resources and smaller firms pursuing government work as supplementary revenue. RFP automation and government contract discovery tools address these barriers by consolidating fragmented opportunity sources, automating qualification analysis, accelerating proposal development, and ensuring compliance with complex regulatory requirements.
Engineering consultancies that integrate these technologies into their business development processes achieve measurable competitive advantages including higher discovery rates, faster qualification decisions, accelerated proposal delivery, improved compliance assurance, and ultimately higher win rates on pursued opportunities. The most successful firms combine technology adoption with disciplined go/no-go decision processes, strategic focus on aligned opportunities, and commitment to delivering exceptional proposal quality. By leveraging available tools and platforms while maintaining professional standards and strategic focus, Canadian engineering consultancies can transform government contracting from a challenging, time-intensive process into a scalable growth engine supporting sustained business expansion.
Sources
https://www.biddetail.com/blogdetail/request-for-proposal-government-of-canada-a-complete-guide/1037
https://www.deltek.com/en/government-contracting/guide/canadian-government-contracts
https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2021/sac-isc/R2-197-2002-eng.pdf
https://ontariotenders.app.jaggaer.com/esop/nac-host/public/web/login.html
https://ontariotenders.bravosolution.com/esop/nac-host/public/web/login.html
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracting-canadian-infrastructure-guide
https://www.biddetail.com/blogdetail/request-for-proposal-government-of-canada-a-complete-guide/1037
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/documents/2t-rfso1-eng.pdf
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sp-ps/clients/criteres-criteria-eng.html
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracting-canada-ai-rfp-solutions
https://www.inventive.ai/blog-posts/ai-government-rfp-workflow-tips
https://www.govsignals.ai/articles/what-is-ai-rfp-automation
https://acec-bc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025_Equity-in-Procurement-Report_FINAL_ba.pdf
https://therfpfirm.com/managing-regulatory-requirements-in-government-proposals-compliance-matters/
https://hudson-bidwriters.com/what-is-the-correct-federal-proposal-writing-process/
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracting-canadian-infrastructure-guide
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracts-canada-municipal-vendor-tips
https://saa-acs.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/index-eng.cfm?af=ZnVzZWFjdGlvbj1hY3Mubm1zb19hbGwmbGFuZz1lbmc%3D
https://www.apmp.org/Web/Web/Learning-Resources/Bid-Proposal-Software.aspx
https://www.deltek.com/en/government-contracting/guide/canadian-government-contracts
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracts-simplified-ai-tools-for-canadian-bids
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracts-canada-ai-powered-procurement
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/sspc-cpss-doe-agd-p6-eng.html
https://www.cmaanet.org/sites/default/files/resource/Qualifications%20vs%20Price-Based.pdf
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html
https://cassels.com/insights/primer-on-federal-government-contracting/
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/spc-cps-eng.html
```