Tired of procurement pain? Our AI-powered platform automates the painful parts of identifying, qualifying, and responding to Canadian opportunities so you can focus on what you do best: delivering quality goods and services to government.
```html
How Canadian Systems Integrators Can Transform Government Contracts Through TBIPS, SBIPS, and ProServices: A Comprehensive Guide to Federal Government Procurement
Canadian systems integrators face an enormous opportunity within the federal government procurement market, which represents billions of dollars in annual spending on information technology services, infrastructure solutions, and professional consulting. However, accessing this market requires navigating complex procurement vehicles, fragmented opportunity discovery across multiple platforms, and labor-intensive proposal development processes. This comprehensive guide explores how systems integrators can systematically approach federal government RFPs, government procurement best practices, and specialized procurement methods to build a predictable pipeline of government contracts while avoiding the costly mistakes that result from missing high-value opportunities. Government contracts represent some of the most stable and valuable work available to Canadian technology firms, yet many integrators miss 60-80% of relevant opportunities simply due to inefficient discovery processes. By understanding how to find government contracts Canada through CanadaBuys, mastering RFP qualification techniques, and leveraging modern procurement software solutions, systems integrators can fundamentally transform their government contracting capabilities and create sustainable revenue streams.
Understanding the Canadian Federal Government Procurement Landscape and PSPC's Central Role
The Canadian federal government procurement framework operates through a sophisticated, centralized system managed by Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC). PSPC handles more than 75 percent of the total value of federal purchases, managing government's central procurement activities on behalf of federal departments and agencies.[2] This centralized approach creates both opportunities and challenges for systems integrators seeking to win government contracts. Federal government spending exceeds $27 billion annually on goods and services through PSPC, making this procurement market one of North America's most substantial and stable sources of work for qualified suppliers.[5]
The federal government's commitment to digital transformation and cloud infrastructure modernization has significantly increased demand for IT consulting services. Systems integrators specializing in cloud migration, infrastructure modernization, and operational excellence can access consistent opportunities through mandatory procurement vehicles specifically designed for IT professional services. Understanding these vehicles—Task-Based Informatics Professional Services (TBIPS), Solutions-Based Informatics Professional Services (SBIPS), and ProServices—is essential for any systems integrator pursuing federal contracts. Each vehicle operates under different rules, serves different value thresholds, and requires different qualification approaches.
The Three Primary Federal Procurement Vehicles for IT Professional Services
TBIPS: Task-Based Informatics Professional Services for Discrete IT Assignments
Task-Based Informatics Professional Services (TBIPS) represents PSPC's mandatory government-wide method of supply for discrete IT work assignments valued above the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement threshold.[4] TBIPS functions as a pre-qualification system where suppliers undergo competitive evaluation to become pre-qualified to bid on specific task opportunities. Once a systems integrator achieves TBIPS pre-qualification, federal departments can issue task authorizations directly rather than conducting open competitions. This distinction fundamentally changes the competitive landscape by reducing the number of potential competitors for individual opportunities.
TBIPS operates through seven core areas of expertise covering project management, business analysis, software development, system architecture, and related informatics disciplines.[4] The supply arrangement itself is valid for multiple years, creating extended periods during which pre-qualified suppliers can pursue numerous task opportunities. Task authorizations issued under TBIPS typically have response periods of two to three weeks, creating significant time pressure for proposal development. Federal departments issue task authorizations describing specific IT work requirements and evaluation criteria, then request proposals from pre-qualified suppliers. Competition among TBIPS holders is evaluated based on proposed personnel qualifications, proposed methodology, pricing, and past performance on similar engagements.
For systems integrators pursuing TBIPS qualification, demonstrating relevant experience is critical. Suppliers must show three or more years of experience in their applicable categories, maintain appropriate certifications, and often hold security clearances depending on the sensitivity of work they intend to pursue. The cost of TBIPS pre-qualification investment typically pays dividends through consistent opportunity visibility and reduced competition compared to open competitive tendering. However, qualification is not automatic—PSPC continuously accepts new bidders throughout the supply arrangement period, allowing systems integrators to pursue qualification even after initial TBIPS rounds close.
SBIPS: Solutions-Based Informatics Professional Services for Complex IT Solutions
Solutions-Based Informatics Professional Services (SBIPS) represents the federal government's procurement vehicle for comprehensive IT solutions where suppliers assume responsibility for defining the solution, managing implementation, and often accepting accountability for project outcomes.[1] Unlike TBIPS' task-oriented approach, SBIPS engagements typically involve larger budgets, longer implementation timelines, and more complex technical requirements. The framework operates through eleven specialized service streams directly relevant to systems integrators, including Systems Integration, Information Technology Systems Management, and Security Management streams.[2] SBIPS contracts frequently exceed TBIPS task authorization values, with many SBIPS engagements valued at millions of dollars and spanning multiple fiscal years.
To qualify for SBIPS, systems integrators must demonstrate domain expertise through documented project evidence and maintain security clearances appropriate to the work. The bidding process uses the Centralized Professional Services System (CPSS), where government departments filter suppliers by tier, region, and capability level. SBIPS requires suppliers to articulate solution ownership, meaning the integrator defines methodologies, manages resources, and guarantees deliverables. This outcome-oriented approach differs significantly from task-based work, requiring different proposal strategies and implementation planning.
SBIPS represents some of the most valuable federal IT contracts available, particularly for systems integrators with expertise in enterprise transformation, cloud infrastructure design, and security solutions. However, the competition for SBIPS opportunities is intense. Firms must clearly demonstrate how their proposed solutions address government requirements while managing risk effectively. The proposal development effort for SBIPS opportunities is substantial, often requiring 100+ page documents addressing technical, management, and financial criteria.
ProServices: Professional Services Below the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement Threshold
ProServices is the mandatory method of supply for professional services requirements below the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement (CKFTA) threshold.[10] This procurement vehicle uses a supply arrangement structure where pre-qualified suppliers compete for individual requirements. Unlike standing offers where government simply calls up pre-arranged services, ProServices is a supply arrangement where government departments must conduct a competitive solicitation process for each requirement. Search parameters including tier, category, region, level of expertise, and Indigenous status determine which suppliers are invited to compete.
ProServices offers advantages and disadvantages compared to TBIPS and SBIPS. The administrative burden for individual requirements is typically lower than SBIPS, with shorter proposal response periods and simpler evaluation criteria. However, pre-qualification requirements remain rigorous, and competition for opportunities is broad. Systems integrators pursuing ProServices qualification should focus on developing strong capability statements and demonstrating relevant experience within specific service categories. The ongoing opportunity to refresh qualifications quarterly means that systems integrators can pursue pre-qualification even if not selected in initial rounds.
CanadaBuys: The Central Platform for Discovering Federal Procurement Opportunities
CanadaBuys serves as the Government of Canada's unified portal for federal procurement opportunities, aggregating tender opportunities from PSPC and other federal departments and agencies.[2] Launched in 2022, CanadaBuys consolidated procurement opportunities previously scattered across multiple departmental websites and regional procurement offices. The platform hosts opportunities valued above established thresholds—$25,000 for goods and $40,000 for services and construction contracts—providing advanced search, filtering, and notification capabilities. For systems integrators, CanadaBuys represents the primary source for discovering TBIPS task authorizations, SBIPS call-ups, and ProServices solicitations.
However, relying exclusively on manual CanadaBuys monitoring presents significant limitations. Research indicates that firms relying solely on manual CanadaBuys monitoring waste substantial resources, often missing 70 percent or more of relevant opportunities due to inconsistent posting terminology, search algorithm limitations, and the sheer volume of opportunities posted daily.[2] Additionally, CanadaBuys amendments frequently modify key requirements or close dates, requiring ongoing monitoring to track changes to opportunities under consideration. These practical limitations have driven adoption of aggregation platforms and AI-powered monitoring systems that supplement direct CanadaBuys access with systematic filtering and alerting designed specifically for business development teams.
Systems integrators should understand CanadaBuys functionality thoroughly. The platform includes tender notices, award information, and historical procurement data that reveal buying patterns across federal departments and agencies. By analyzing award data, systems integrators can identify which departments make significant IT infrastructure investments, understand typical contract values and timelines, and identify potential strategic relationships. The platform's search functionality allows filtering by Goods and Services Identification Numbers (GSINs), region, department, and procurement category, enabling more targeted opportunity discovery than simple keyword searches.
The Critical Challenge: Fragmented Opportunity Discovery and Missed High-Value Contracts
Canadian systems integrators pursuing comprehensive government procurement strategies face a fundamental discovery challenge that extends beyond federal opportunities. While CanadaBuys serves as the central federal procurement portal, the Canadian procurement landscape intentionally distributes opportunities across multiple platforms reflecting federal, provincial, and municipal governance structures. Ontario's Tenders Portal, British Columbia's BC Bid, Alberta's Alberta Purchasing Connection, and municipal systems operated by Toronto, Montreal, Calgary, Ottawa, and Vancouver each host significant opportunities.[2] Additionally, specialized platforms like MERX (formerly Biddingo) aggregate opportunities from multiple sources.
This fragmentation means that systems integrators must actively monitor dozens of separate websites and platforms to identify relevant opportunities. The administrative burden is substantial—business development teams spending hours daily checking multiple portals waste resources that could support strategic capture activities, relationship building with government buyers, and proposal development on winnable opportunities. Many firms respond to this challenge through manual processes that systematically miss opportunities, particularly when posting terminology varies across platforms or when opportunities receive minimal public notice beyond the initial posting.
The impact of missed opportunities is particularly severe for high-value federal IT contracts. Large infrastructure projects, enterprise transformation initiatives, and strategic cloud migration engagements represent the most valuable government contracts available. These opportunities often receive extensive pre-RFP engagement and relationship building, making early awareness critical. Systems integrators that miss announcement windows cannot participate in the capture phase where competitive advantage is often established. Missing even one significant SBIPS opportunity worth $2-5 million can represent 10-20% of annual revenue for mid-market integrators.
Understanding Compliance Requirements and Evaluation Methodology in Federal Procurement
Success in federal government RFP responses requires deep understanding of compliance requirements that fundamentally shape proposal strategy. Canadian government RFPs impose strict compliance requirements that determine not just scoring but eligibility itself. Non-compliance with mandatory requirements results in automatic rejection regardless of proposal quality or pricing competitiveness. The evaluation of government contract proposals follows formal, documented procedures designed to ensure fairness, transparency, and consistent application of predetermined criteria.[6]
Federal procurement uses two categories of evaluation criteria: mandatory and point-rated. Mandatory evaluation criteria identify minimum requirements essential to successful completion of work and are evaluated on a pass/fail basis.[26] Bids failing to meet mandatory requirements receive no further consideration. These might include accessibility requirements, financial stability demonstration through audited statements, essential performance characteristics, specific licensing requirements, security clearance levels, delivery deadline commitments, technical requirements, or certification compliance. Systems integrators frequently discover disqualifying mandatory requirements late in the proposal development process, resulting in wasted effort on doomed proposals.
Point-rated evaluation criteria are used to determine relative technical merit and distinguish one proposal from another.[26] These criteria might address strategy, methodology, company experience, team qualifications, and facilities or equipment. A specific pass mark can be set for point-rated criteria—commonly 70%—below which a bid is considered non-responsive. Understanding the weighting between technical and financial evaluation is essential for proposal strategy. If a procurement is evaluated 60% technical merit and 40% price, proposal strategy should emphasize differentiation and value rather than aggressive pricing that might appear unsustainable.
The evaluation team typically includes at least three individuals with substantive understanding of the specific requirements, enabling collective assessment of technical merit, managerial capability, and financial reasonableness of competing proposals.[26] This evaluation team approach means that proposals must communicate clearly to multiple audiences with varying technical backgrounds. Jargon should be minimized, and key differentiators must be explicitly stated rather than implied. Systems integrators whose proposals speak to evaluator concerns and directly address evaluation criteria significantly improve their competitiveness.
The Role of Modern Procurement Software and AI Government Procurement Solutions
Modern procurement software and RFP automation Canada solutions address the interconnected challenges of opportunity discovery, qualification assessment, and proposal development through systematic automation. These platforms aggregate opportunities from multiple sources—CanadaBuys, provincial tender portals, municipal systems, and specialized platforms—into centralized dashboards accessible to business development teams. Rather than requiring business development teams to manually check thirty or more websites daily, advanced procurement platforms continuously monitor multiple sources and alert teams to newly posted opportunities matching configured business profiles.
For systems integrators, the time savings enable reallocation of business development resources from opportunity discovery—which generates no billable value—toward strategic activities including relationship building with government buyers, proposal development, and competitive positioning. Research from government contracting organizations suggests that firms relying exclusively on manual portal checking waste 60-70% of business development time on discovery activities, leaving limited capacity for capture and proposal development that actually wins contracts.[2]
AI government procurement software addresses qualification challenges through natural language processing algorithms that classify opportunities by industry codes, keywords, and eligibility criteria. Machine learning models analyze historical award patterns to predict future tenders in specific sectors and predict which opportunities align with a systems integrator's capabilities. This intelligent qualification analysis processes hundreds of pages of RFP documents in minutes to identify mandatory certifications, security clearance levels, financial thresholds, technical experience minimums, and accessibility compliance requirements that would otherwise require hours of manual review.
Proposal development automation represents another critical capability of modern procurement software. Government RFP AI tools address the "blank page problem" by generating compliant draft content structured to evaluation criteria. Using natural language generation trained on successful government proposals, these systems produce context-specific content for methodology descriptions aligned with evaluation matrices, corporate capability statements with automated project insertion, and risk management frameworks incorporating jurisdiction-specific requirements. Compliance checking functionality integrates with proposal development to flag deviations from mandatory requirements like Canada's Contract Security Program or accessibility standards, identifying potential compliance issues before submission.
Building a Systematic Federal Government Contracting Capability
The Canadian government procurement market represents substantial opportunities for systems integrators willing to invest in understanding the system, registering appropriately, monitoring opportunities systematically, and developing proposals that clearly address government requirements and evaluation criteria. Success requires moving beyond reactive responses to occasional RFP solicitations toward systematic approaches that encompass continuous opportunity discovery, rapid qualification assessment, efficient proposal development, and rigorous compliance management.
Systems integrators should establish clear pursuit criteria for government contracting. Not every government RFP merits response. Organizations should define project scales, types, locations, and contract values that align with strategic objectives and capabilities. Systems integrators should set win-probability thresholds, focusing business development effort on high-fit pursuits rather than responding to every opportunity. Establishing this discipline prevents resource depletion on low-probability opportunities and improves overall win rates by concentrating proposal quality on winnable work.
Successful government contracting capability requires internal expertise embedded in ongoing business development processes. This includes individuals trained on TBIPS and SBIPS qualification requirements, compliance specialists who understand government security and regulatory obligations, proposal managers experienced with government evaluation methodologies, and capture managers who build long-term relationships with government clients and understand their strategic direction. For mid-market systems integrators, this expertise can develop internally through structured learning and experience, or can be augmented through engagement with government contracting advisors and proposal writing specialists.
Strategic Positioning Within Competitive Government Markets
Cloud infrastructure and IT consulting represent competitive service categories within Canadian government procurement. Numerous consultancies compete for these opportunities, creating pricing pressure and requiring differentiation beyond cost. Successful systems integrators differentiate through specialized expertise in emerging technologies relevant to government priorities, demonstrated success delivering comparable engagements within government environments, and certifications reflecting advanced capabilities.
Government-specific differentiation is particularly valuable. Systems integrators demonstrating deep expertise in data residency requirements ensuring information remains within Canadian borders, encryption standards aligned with Canadian Centre for Cyber Security guidance, supply chain security requirements reflecting government concerns about foreign-sourced technology, and access control frameworks appropriate to information sensitivity classification create compelling differentiation versus competitors whose primary experience lies in private sector work.[14] Recent policy developments including expanded security requirements for cloud services, mandatory climate resilience assessments, and technology supply chain guidelines addressing vendor risk create both challenges and opportunities for systems integrators that proactively address these standards ahead of competitors.
Developing Effective Bid/No-Bid Decision Processes
Systems integrators pursuing government contracts must develop disciplined bid/no-bid decision processes that focus resources on winnable opportunities. The fundamental principle underlying effective bid decisions is not identifying opportunities you will win, but eliminating opportunities you will lose. The bid/no-bid process should evaluate strategic alignment, capability match, profitability, resource availability, and win probability through structured analysis rather than subjective judgment.[49]
Strategic fit assessment asks whether the opportunity aligns with the systems integrator's long-term business objectives. Does the work support strategic market positioning? Does it build capabilities valuable for future pursuits? Does the government buyer represent a strategic relationship worth development? Capability assessment addresses whether the organization possesses the technical skills, certifications, security clearances, and relevant experience to deliver the proposed solution. Profitability assessment ensures the expected margin justifies the proposal development investment and execution risk. Resource availability assessment confirms that proposal development and contract execution do not jeopardize existing commitments.
Win probability assessment requires realistic evaluation based on competitive position, customer relationship strength, incumbent status, and RFP requirements alignment. A general rule suggests that if proposal development costs exceed 5% of potential contract value and win probability is below 30%, expected return on investment is likely negative, warranting a no-bid decision. Systems integrators should document their bid/no-bid decisions systematically, enabling continuous process improvement through analysis of outcomes and rationale.
Implementing Compliance-Driven Proposal Development Strategies
Government RFP responses must prioritize compliance before innovation. Each RFP explicitly states what government evaluators expect to see, and proposals that fail to address stated requirements systematically lose evaluator confidence. The first step in proposal development should be creating a compliance matrix—a detailed table mapping each RFP requirement to the specific proposal section addressing it. This matrix ensures nothing is missed and enables reviewers to quickly verify that all requirements receive explicit attention.
Proposal structure should follow RFP instructions precisely. RFP formatting requirements, response period timelines, and submission procedures are not suggestions—they are mandatory compliance expectations. Proposals failing to follow format requirements may be rejected administratively regardless of content quality. Section numbering, page limits, font specifications, and appendix requirements should be followed exactly. Many proposals fail not because the technical approach is inferior but because evaluators cannot readily locate required information due to non-standard formatting.
Technical proposal development should address mandatory criteria comprehensively before emphasizing point-rated criteria. For each mandatory criterion, the proposal should explicitly state how the proposed solution meets the requirement, provide supporting evidence, and address evaluator concerns about implementation risk. Only after thoroughly addressing mandatory requirements should proposal development focus on differentiation and value-add under point-rated criteria.
Leveraging Data and Historical Award Information for Strategic Intelligence
Canadian government procurement data published through CanadaBuys and open data portals provides strategic intelligence enabling more effective government contracting. Analysis of award data reveals which departments make significant IT infrastructure investments, typical contract values and timelines for different procurement types, and patterns in supplier selection. Systems integrators should systematically analyze procurement data for their target departments to understand buying patterns and requirements evolution.
Award data analysis can identify which competitors consistently win federal contracts, revealing both direct competitors and potential teaming partners. Understanding competitor strengths and weaknesses enables systems integrators to position their proposals against known competitive dynamics. Award data also reveals which consultancies successfully deliver to government, indicating which firms possess the experience and credentials needed for qualification. This intelligence informs strategic decisions about whether to pursue TBIPS, SBIPS, or ProServices qualification, and what specific service categories offer the best opportunities.
Federal procurement data indicates that IT services represent one of the fastest-growing government spending categories, with cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, and enterprise transformation being particularly robust. By understanding these trends, systems integrators can position themselves in markets where government demand is increasing and competitor pressure may be less intense than in mature service categories.
Security Clearances and Compliance Requirements in Federal IT Contracting
Security clearances represent critical qualification requirements for many federal IT contracts, particularly those involving Protected B information or classified work. The Contract Security Program provides security screening of organizations and personnel, determining whether organizations can participate in contracts with security requirements.[27] Understanding the different security levels and clearance timelines is essential for making realistic bid/no-bid decisions.
Organization-level security screening assesses whether the firm meets security requirements of contracts. Personnel-level screening determines whether specific employees can access protected or classified information. Facility Security Clearance (FSC) applies to organizations contracted for work involving classified information. Designated Organization Screening (DOS) addresses work involving Protected B information that does not require full classification-level clearance. The security screening process requires 90+ days minimum, sometimes extending to 6 months for more stringent clearance levels. Systems integrators should anticipate security clearance timelines in their bid/no-bid decisions, ensuring clearances will be current before contract execution.
Conclusion: Transforming Government Contracting Into Sustainable Revenue Growth
The Canadian federal government procurement market represents one of North America's most substantial and stable sources of work for systems integrators. Federal government spending exceeding $27 billion annually on goods and services, with IT professional services growing rapidly as government modernizes legacy systems and advances digital transformation initiatives, creates consistent opportunities for well-positioned integrators. Success requires moving beyond opportunistic responses to occasional RFPs toward systematic government contracting capability encompassing continuous opportunity discovery, strategic qualification assessment, efficient proposal development, and rigorous compliance management.
Systems integrators that develop disciplined approaches to federal procurement—understanding TBIPS, SBIPS, and ProServices vehicles; mastering CanadaBuys navigation; implementing effective bid/no-bid decision processes; and leveraging modern tools to automate discovery and qualification—can transform government contracting from an unpredictable, resource-intensive activity into a reliable revenue pipeline supporting long-term business growth. By combining modern technology approaches with deep understanding of government procurement processes and strategic business development practices, Canadian systems integrators can compete effectively even against larger competitors, leveraging superior process efficiency and strategic focus to multiply the government contracting opportunities they can pursue within resource constraints. The opportunity is substantial for integrators that commit to understanding and systematizing their approach to one of Canada's most significant and stable government markets.
Sources
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/spics-sbips-eng.html
https://www.biddetail.com/blogdetail/request-for-proposal-government-of-canada-a-complete-guide/1037
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-services-procurement/services/acquisitions/professional.html
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracts-canada-ai-rfp-automation
https://search.open.canada.ca/en/ct/?sort=contract_value_f+desc&page=1&search_text=%22S.i.Systems%22
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/win-federal-cybersecurity-contracts-master-tbips-sbips-canadabuys
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracts-canada-rfp-automation-tools
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracts-canada-ai-enhanced-rfp-qualification
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html
https://opo-boa.gc.ca/praapp-prorev/2009-2010/chptr-5-eng.html
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/sspc-cpss-doe-agd-p3-eng.html
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sp-ps/amapmf-hpsaw-eng.html
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracts-canada-ai-enhanced-rfp-qualification
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/sspc-cpss-doe-agd-p6-eng.html
https://iapp.org/news/a/canada-s-proposed-federal-budget-prioritizes-ai-investment-initiatives
https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/421/OGGO/Reports/RP9996115/oggorp15/oggorp15-e.pdf
https://rfpbot.com/blog/track-multiple-rfps-without-missing-deadlines
https://donnees-data.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/ba2/ac-cb/soutien-support-eng.html
https://www.i4c.com/navigating-canadas-government-procurement-vehicles/
https://govlab.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/gpl_rfp_guidebook_2021.pdf
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/sptb-tbps/am-sa-eng.html
https://govcanadacontracts.ca/it_subcategories/it_devices_equipment/
https://publicus.ai/newsletter/government-contracts-sbips-opportunities-explained
https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/canada-it-services-market
https://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/app-acq/spc-cps/spics-sbips-eng.html
https://hinzconsulting.com/government-contracting-risk-management-navigating-challenges-for-success/
https://www.blakes.com/insights/federal-government-rolls-out-its-buy-canadian-policy/
https://www.visiblethread.com/blog/to-bid-or-not-to-bid-make-the-right-decision-every-time/
https://iq.govwin.com/neo/marketAnalysis/index?researchMarket=PCMAP
https://www.ostglobalsolutions.com/the-secret-to-winning-more-Government-contracts-capture/
https://donnees-data.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/ba2/ac-cb/soutien-support-eng.html
https://federalgovadvisors.com/ultimate-guide-to-winning-government-contracts/
https://www23.statcan.gc.ca/imdb/p3VD.pl?Function=getVD&TVD=1369825
https://www.sba.gov/federal-contracting/contracting-guide/how-win-contracts
https://search.open.canada.ca/opendata/?search_text=canadabuys
```