Glossary term
Complexity Level 2
TERM SUMMARY
Complexity Level 2 is a Government of Canada procurement classification for purchases with at least one Level 2 characteristic, such as subjective evaluation criteria or modified terms, and none from...
- Why it matters
- Complexity Level 2 is a classification the Government of Canada applies to a procurement. It describes a purchase that includes at least one specified Level 2 characteristic and includes no criteria that belong to...
- Category
- Canadian government procurement terminology
- Reference role
- This term page is designed to be linkable, crawlable, and easy to quote or summarize.
Complexity Level 2 is a classification the Government of Canada applies to a procurement. It describes a purchase that includes at least one specified Level 2 characteristic and includes no criteria that belong to Complexity Levels 3, 4 or 5. The characteristics are published in the CanadaBuys buyer guidance and in the Supply Manual.
The buyer assigns the level, not the supplier. Public Services and Procurement Canada's Acquisitions Program uses the classification alongside a procurement-risk assessment to set approval, review and process requirements. The level tells you how the buyer has framed the requirement and which internal checks apply to it.
The characteristics that define a Level 2 procurement
The CanadaBuys list of complexity characteristics and Chapter 2 annexes of the Supply Manual name the features that place a procurement at Level 2:
- Government-specified performance requirements for commercially available goods.
- An innovative solution achieved by using existing technology or processes.
- Services with subjective results, such as consultations and recommendations.
- Modified procurement templates, new custom clauses, or terms and conditions outside the Standard Acquisition Clauses and Conditions (SACC) Manual.
- One or more evaluation criteria that require subjective judgment.
- Industrial Regional Benefits or value propositions.
- Vendor pre-qualification, including the establishment of supply arrangements.
- Advance payments.
A single item from this list is enough to make a procurement Level 2, provided nothing in it belongs to a higher level.
How the Level 2 threshold is set
The classification works as a ceiling as well as a floor. A procurement stays at Level 2 only while it carries no criteria from Levels 3, 4 or 5. If a higher-level criterion is present, the procurement moves up to that level. A Level 2 file is therefore more involved than a routine purchase, but it does not carry the features that define the higher tiers.
The buyer pairs the level with a procurement-risk assessment. Together, they determine the approval, review and process requirements that apply to the file.
Review steps that attach to Level 2
Two review rules in the CanadaBuys buyer guidance name Level 2 directly. First, for Complexity Levels 2 and 3, the procurement-risk assessment may determine that formal peer review of offer-evaluation results is required. The offer evaluation process guidance sets this out.
Second, the Advanced Contract Award Notice guidance covers rejected statements of capabilities. The review must be done by an authority at least one level above the approval authority. For a Level 2 procurement, the listed authority is a director or regional director.
What Complexity Level 2 means for a supplier
You do not apply for a Level 2 designation, and the sources prescribe no supplier certification for it. The buyer classifies the procurement. What you can do is read the solicitation with the Level 2 characteristics in mind.
- Expect evaluation criteria that call for judgment, and answer each one exactly as written.
- Check for customized clauses or terms outside the SACC Manual, and review them before you commit to a price.
- Watch for pre-qualification or supply arrangement steps that must be completed before you can bid.
- Read any value proposition or Industrial Regional Benefits requirements closely, and confirm whether the contract allows advance payments.
Level 2 procurements can also go through formal peer review of evaluation results, so a complete, clearly structured bid that addresses every stated requirement is easier for evaluators to score and defend.