Tired of procurement pain? Our AI-powered platform automates the painful parts of identifying, qualifying, and responding to Canadian opportunities so you can focus on what you do best: delivering quality goods and services to government.
Alternative risk financing
A risk management strategy where a contractor retains financial responsibility for losses up to a specified limit, thus actively managing the retained risk before transferring the remainder to an insurer.
Self-insured retention: A Comprehensive Guide
I. Introduction
What Is Self-insured retention, and Why Does It Matter?
Purpose: A risk management strategy where a contractor retains financial responsibility for losses up to a specified limit, thus actively managing the retained risk before transferring the remainder to an insurer.
Context: In Canadian government contracting, Self-insured retention helps departments like Public Services and Procurement Canada and the Treasury Board Secretariat evaluate supplier risk profiles, align insurance requirements with budget constraints and ensure value for taxpayer dollars.
Overview: This guide breaks down Self-insured retention's core elements, illustrates how it supports compliance, efficiency and strategic objectives and highlights how AI-driven risk analytics and data visualization tools are reshaping retention decisions in procurement.
II. Definition
A. Clear and Concise Definition
What it is: A risk management approach in which a contractor bears initial financial losses up to a set threshold before insurance coverage applies.
Key Terms: Retention limit, insurer, risk transfer, claim threshold.
B. Breakdown of Key Components
Retention Limit: The maximum loss amount the contractor self-funds, often established in a contract clause and aligned with departmental risk tolerance.
Claim Process: Procedures for reporting and documenting losses under the retention layer, ensuring timely resolution and audit readiness in systems like the contract workspace.
Insurance Trigger: The point at which an insurer becomes liable for additional losses, defined by policy language and public procurement regulations.
C. Illustrative Examples
Example 1: Public Services and Procurement Canada sets a $100,000 retention for a major infrastructure requisition, requiring the contractor to cover smaller risks and speeding up minor claim settlements.
Example 2: A Department of National Defence supplier chooses Self-insured retention to optimize premiums on a multi-year supply arrangement, using internal loss data and AI analytics to set thresholds.
III. Importance
A. Practical Applications
Self-insured retention standardizes how Canadian federal departments assess insurance in procurement. For example, Treasury Board policies mandate retention clauses in solicitations, and teams track costs in a centralized contract workspace to ensure compliance.
B. Relevant Laws, Regulations, or Policies
Key authorities include the Treasury Board Contracting Policy, the Financial Administration Act and provisions of the Canadian Free Trade Agreement that influence retention thresholds and fairness in requisition evaluations. The PSPC Insurance Requirements Directive also guides minimum insurance and retention levels.
C. Implications
Adopting Self-insured retention can yield cost savings through lower premiums, improve risk visibility, foster accountability among suppliers and deliver strategic advantages by aligning financial exposure with organizational risk appetites.
IV. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
A. Common Questions
Q: What does Self-insured retention mean? A: It's the portion of risk a contractor funds before insurance coverage begins, enhancing control over claims.
Q: Why is Self-insured retention important? A: It balances premium costs and risk exposure, supports regulatory compliance and improves decision-making with real loss data.
Q: How is Self-insured retention used in practice? A: Departments embed retention clauses in contract documents, track losses in contract workspaces and analyze trends to refine thresholds annually.
Q: How do federal teams determine appropriate retention levels? A: Using actuarial simulations, historical loss records and guidance from the PSPC Insurance Requirements Directive.
Q: What distinguishes retention from a deductible? A: Unlike a deductible, retention often requires the contractor to manage and finance claims directly, impacting cash flow and risk management practices.
B. Clarifications of Misconceptions
Misconception 1: “Self-insured retention is the same as a deductible.”
Truth: Retention places the financial and administrative burden of initial losses on the contractor, whereas deductibles are settled by the insurer on behalf of the insured.
Misconception 2: “Only large agencies use Self-insured retention.”
Truth: Small and medium departments can adopt retention to customize insurance programs, optimize budgets and demonstrate risk stewardship.
V. Conclusion
A. Recap
Self-insured retention empowers Canadian government entities to manage costs, control risk and comply with public procurement policies through clearly defined thresholds and data-driven governance.
B. Encouragement
Organizations should evaluate potential retention levels in tandem with insurance advisors and leverage AI analytics to optimize exposures and premiums.
C. Suggested Next Steps
Review the Clause Library for sample retention clauses aligned with Treasury Board Secretariat standards.
Enroll in federal procurement training on risk management and insurance analysis.
Consult specialized insurance brokers to design robust Self-insured retention frameworks for government contracts.
Share

Stop wasting time on RFPs — focus on what matters.
Start receiving relevant RFPs and comprehensive proposal support today.